At this point, russians gonna lose all of their equipment in this year

At this point, russians gonna lose all of their equipment in this year

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    RAND corporation just said this last week that NATO is depleted and Putin could be in Berlin in 3 days.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ah yeah. No source just throwing that out there, Italy said Wagner is pumping migrants from areas of African they control into people trafficking channels they run into the EU you can check reuters on that one though

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The RAND corporation makes all their reports available on their web site anon.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Its up to you to post the source as you are the one claiming it anon. Rand pump out reports all the time, they have some occasional good ones and some occasional bad ones, they are on a lot more than military stuff as well. I would say that based on your comment, they are laughably incorrect. NATO has not even touched most of its own warfighting munitions at all, most of the stuff that went to Ukraine was coming to its sell by date and expiring. I'd love RAND to tell me where all the NATOS air forces ordinance is supposed to have vanished too for example, or naval. Your claim just makes no sense whatsoever.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You’re the first one to ask for a source, now source what you said and I’ll comply and source the RAND report. But it’s difficult to believe you have integrity or are interested in sources if you’re not willing to source your own material.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              ha ha! nice trolling dude!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > NATO has not even touched most of its own warfighting munitions at al
            Horseshit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Then link the report Black person.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How do you watch Russians lose a hundred thousand men to take over in a full year an area of Ukraine they basically already almost completely controlled before the invasion and still claim shit this moronic? Complete imbecile

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not a problem because Russia's still racking up a 3:1 K:D ratio

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ...and other hilarious tales /misc/troons tell themselves to stop the anxiety attacks.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Better funnel more money to the MIC that is in no way connected with the Rand Corporation

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      can we see it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How anyone could believe this kind of bullshit is totally beyond me.

      OBVIOUSLY it takes two more weeks, not 3 days.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >sniff sniff, Berlin in 3 days, sniff

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Still cannot take Bakhmut
      >Putin could be in Berlin in 3 days.
      In a coffin maybe.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Bakhmut is basically subutais favorit tactic, there is a reason they haven't closed of the encirclement

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Putin could be in Berlin in 3 days.
      I guess you probably could strap him to a ballistic missile and launch him at Alexanderplatz, so its technically not a lie.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I guess you probably could strap him to a ballistic missile and launch him at Alexanderplatz, so its technically not a lie.
        kek

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Then do it. What are you waiting for?

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    At the bare minimum it's impressive they haven't run out.
    >insert qualification to not be called vatnik here
    Considering it's primarily Russian equipment versus a bunch of assorted western equipment, it is certainly surprising there are so many total Russia has but maybe I'm just moronic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >At the bare minimum it's impressive they haven't run out.
      How is that impressive? You have not lost your last artillery tractor yet to the war you started against the much much smaller neighbour on your border even though you have been ab absolutely thrashed by them militarily. How is that impressive?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >How is that impressive?
        Impressive does not necessarily imply a positive outcome

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          True but its still in no way impressive.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >

          [...]

          dont forget to bump your tread Sir cumrade. or you will loose your shitting street privileges.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Ban request denied.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Tbh this guy would probably feel the comfyest in a trench with shit food and winter cold

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine is basically 1/3rd Russia and started the war with a manpower advantage

        It's not like Ukraine is a wittle ittle bitty country. it's the biggest country in Europe besides Russia

        It'd be like if America had to fight a smaller version of America

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Weird, I remember the cope being
          >Ukraine has a small and pathetic army, one of the weakest in Europe
          >They are only surviving because of HATO aid
          Not too long ago.
          Now Ukraine is a serious threats that must be respected, and HATO are akshually terrible?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ukraine has a smaller population than the UK, Germany France etc. Russia is just a worthless frick up that even though it was far larger and had for more military equipment it could not defeat even though it initiated the invasion and held every advantage initially. Russia sucks. We see that every day here just in the quality of individuals who spam pro Russian noise.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >started the war with a manpower advantage
          Lol wut? Russia was the 2nd strongest military on the planet 13 months ago.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >started the war with a manpower advantage
          no they didnt, youre basing this off of the wikipedia page which totaled all of ukraine's military personnel vs russia's initial invasion force. this doesnt take into account that the bulk of that number was TDF which were distributed across all of ukraine, whereas Russia was able to mass its forces at its axes of advance, meaning they always had local superiority.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >be Russia
          >be drunk
          >have bigger country
          >have more men
          >have the “2nd most powerful military”
          >invade neighbor who is smaller with less population but has more troops
          >hilarity ensues
          First off, not they didn’t have more troops. Secondly, that just makes Russia even more stupid if they did. They had over 3 times the population, more tanks, apcs, jets, helicopters, and should have more manufacturing capacity. If they had a manpower disadvantage, why wouldn’t they wait 6-8 months or a full year and train more troops.

          The alternative is they knew Ukraine had more troops, knew they get western gear, knew their own stuff wasn’t up to par, and invaded anyway. You can’t possibly spin any scenario to make them look good.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >ukraine is shit, we will take it in 2 days
          >actually, ukraine is very strong, almost HATO, we still have Moscow

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Even if russia falls and balkanizes it will continue to live eternally, rent free in your head.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody really thought about russhits as anything more than an angry gremlin that spews some propaganda online.
          Now russia sperged out to show the west its might and, uh, it’s not exactly covering itself with glory. You’ll be a rusted laughing stock for the next two decades at the very least.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's also impressive they haven't bloody stopped, after a very clear massive failure in their 3 day operation.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They can't. They have to win or die.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is that a killdozer next to the smoke?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a house but it does look like killdozer

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Russians have taken far fewer casualties than the Ukrainians
    das rite! and moskva made it back to the port under it's own power. also we still control kherson! Z!

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ok mongoloid muttino, see you in bakhmut when they catch your cowardly ass.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >russians gonna lose all of their equipment in this year

    sure?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      To be clear: this is meant as a demoralization post against Vatniks, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/q5nxnyN.jpg

      there is still much old equipment

      https://i.imgur.com/OnVEUmo.jpg

      many even with pre-tossed turrets

      https://i.imgur.com/dmN3bxQ.jpg

      and planes, maybe need some paint

      Serious question: what would it take to get these operational? And would it be worth it?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        a USSR industrial base that Russia does not have. no

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The only time and cost effective way would be to throw out all internal parts and replace with new ones. Considering thise aren't being made anymore, it means cannibalizing all of them for good parts, and fitting in "good enough" modern alternatives where possible.
        If that's not an option, it means trying really hard to de-rust everything until the moving parts move again and a working engine can be fit in. Will the old parts with rust pits hold up without breaking? Will the gun not explode under pressure? Will the engine hold up? Those are all fun questions for the crews at the front to find out.

        The bigger problem, especially with the aircraft, is will the frame hold up under stress. They're made to be usable for a set number of years/flight hours reliably, but that all goes out the window if it sits there rusting and decaying for decades with constant shifts in enviromental conditions. It might look fine on the outside if you fix it up, but you won't know about an internal crack until the wing suddenly snaps off.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        if you got enough spare parts enough workers and a repair shop with all tools you may be able to fix 1 out of 10, will still take a while, also russia got no choice, they have to do it regardless if it makes sense or not

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          APC's and Trucks are going to be easy tier, esp considering alot of Soviet APC's used low Horsepower automotive engines and you can literally swap in a modern V-8 or a COTS diesel from a car.

          BTR-50 had a single diesel V-6
          MT-LB used a diesel V-8
          BTR-60/70 used double gas 6-cylinder engines which were like 180hp combined
          BTR-80 made the switch to a single diese in the 220hp rangel but most of these are in service.
          A KPV barrel can be changed if its toast - alternatively they can drop in a KPPU or Kliver turret or asimilar

          Rusted shit is going to need to get blasted and a repaint.
          The biggest issue is going to be electrical, hydraulics, and suspension - this is unironically where tracked vehicles are going to have advantages - the BTR-50 and MT-LB are going to be relatively easier to restore in this state.

          As for aircraft?
          Mi-2's can be restored readily
          Mi-6 "Hook" was taken out of service due to the rotor fatigue life and would be a major issue - besides Mi-26 is still produced and is better in every way

          The old fighters?
          Fricktons of MiG-23/27 can be operationally restored as can Su-22M
          Older MiG's and Sukhoi's can potentially be turned into drones or loitering munitions - MiG-25 and Su-15 are ripe for this

          https://i.imgur.com/LrmcfwD.jpg

          also helicopters

          Mi-2 would be easy to return to service - it was not a complicated rotorcraft and Russia has other engines it can swap into it

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >The old fighters?
            >Fricktons of MiG-23/27 can be operationally restored as can Su-22M
            >Older MiG's and Sukhoi's can potentially be turned into drones or loitering munitions - MiG-25 and Su-15 are ripe for this
            I doubt the ziggers maintained the records for those airframes, who knows how many were at the end of their life before they went in storage and any restoration will be rushed and incredibly half assed. a rusty btr just stops moving when it breaks, a rusty mig falls out the goddamn sky. frick that shit

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Russia claimed 500 MiG-23 in reserve as of the 2010's.
              MiG-27 had a number of issues but they could probably raise 100

              The soviet union was absolute dog shit when it came to giving their pilots flight hours, even worse they did shit like pairing/tripling where even though they had more than enough fighters and then some for their pilots, in peacetime the squadron would heavily use a select few airframes and keep the rest in low readiness due to the maintenance concerns. There are probably MiG-23's with frick all flight hours - but yes records are going to be a problem.

              Turning an old aircraft into a missile isn't going to have the same considerations though. Why take a chance with a full restore with no paperwork when you can strap two 1000lb bombs bombs to it, drone ot, and point it at Kiev.

              Russia can also turn these old into bunkers, utilizing operational turrets - a la Finland

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                turn tanks*

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Does Russia really have the capability to convert old fighter jets to missiles in meaningful numbers? I thought that requires microchips and electronics that are one of the few things Russia struggles to manufacture domestically.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Russian kamikaze pilots when?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia can also turn these old into bunkers, utilizing operational turrets - a la Finland

                Not a viable idea in the age of the precision guided muntion.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Actually have been wondering about that.

                That's still the best use for otherwise useless turrets no?
                A bit waste of manpower and time, but it is better than than just using trenches and foxholes at main defense line.

                Could also be used as a decoys, to force other side to use their guided mutions to clear scrap metal.
                Although dragging those all across the country to front lines is probably not the best use of limited trucks and trains.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Although dragging those all across the country to front lines is probably not the best use of limited trucks and trains.
                That’s the problem. Guided munitions are fairly expensive but that isn’t the problem for the west. Even old as M72 LAWs can take out the T62s and older shit that is being sent out now. If it was as simple as started them up and driving them out, sure it’s better than nothing. But it’s not that simple. You have to dedicate a lot of resources to refurbish stuff that is only effective against unsupported infantry with no antitank weapons. That doesn’t happen often. The time, manpower, and resources are much much better used on building new things or things that are actually useful.

                Spending your manufacturing capacity on old shit you know will blow up quickly in hopes your enemy runs out of rockets is a moronic strategy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The soviet union was absolute dog shit when it came to giving their pilots flight hours
                my favourite part was when they wrote themselves "flight hours" by measuring it with spent fuel. Which meant they simply dumped the fuel near the base on the ground. A local well near the old base has still flammable "water" due to all of the contamination seeping into the ground

                vatnik union was absolute dogshit, just like its remnants today attempting to kill everyone who was locked in that open air prison with them

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >APC's and Trucks are going to be easy tier
            You've never touched an engine or even a car in your life, nothing about those rust buckets is ever going to work again. You're either too stupid to breathe on your own, or somehow trying to give the pidorashkas false hope.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I think he means easy compared to fixing something like a helicopter or a jet fighter, which seems like a fair assessment

          • 1 year ago
            sage

            it reads like this shitty wishful TV ad: Warsaw is just 2 h tank drive just enough for VDV to iron they parade shirt; for Berlin we dont even need maps most officers have been deployed there already and so on

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Changing an engine and transmission seems like more than a 5 minute job.
            > select a suitable engine and gearbox in manufacture
            > design the mods required. At a minimum new engine supports, fuel filters, new air intake and exhaust pipework. Maybe also new radiators, fuel pipework and electrical wiring
            > Build a test model
            > Field test to confirm it all works under load.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              needs just a new engine and it's ready for combat

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              What was meant by "new" was not "different" but a new/overhauled replacement. Easier said than done depending on who still makes or stocks replacement parts and how large the existing machining and rebuild capacity actually is.

              Consumables deteriorate in storage unless loved and periodically inspected US style.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol Idk man you can't judge from a bird view

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/q5nxnyN.jpg

      there is still much old equipment

      >all those open hatches

      Jesus christ, just imagine the amount of rust. Ruskies really didn't give a shit about their condition.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I want to steal all that shit and sell it for scrap.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I want to steal all that shit and sell it for scrap.

        So does every officer in the Russian armed forces.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing quite like storing a bunch of steel vehicles in a swamp with no coverings or protection

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/q5nxnyN.jpg

      there is still much old equipment

      >all these fighting vehicles
      >absolutely no support vehicles
      Is the Russian doctrine literally just continous offensive and throwing everything you have at the enemy and having your soldiers live off the conquered land like some razing steppe horde?
      Where are the trucks?
      Where are the logistics?
      Compare this to NATO vehicles where one combat vehicles has like 4 trucks just to support it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you are not wrong, their doctrine is to attack and maintain initiative at all costs. we are now observing what it looks like when things dont go according to plan

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That was the French doctrine until 1915, too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        russian infastructure is so shit they don't bother with it at this point so their war strategy is to have survivors of an attack raid and loot like a bunch of marauding barbarians.

        russians are dull and servile too so they can be whipped like serfs into performing any task, webm related

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there is still much old equipment

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that is not combat effective. that will take years to refurbish. that rusted to shit equipment is already lost

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        [...]
        [...]
        Serious question: what would it take to get these operational? And would it be worth it?

        Lets put it like this.
        Russia claimed 4000 in service/operational reserve T-64 in 1995. That number shrinked to 2k in the 2000's.

        Ukraine had around 3,600 of which it only ever used around 2,400 - using the rest for long term storage/parts and occasionally a hull used for a special vehicle.
        We can round Ukraines number up to 4k because why not.
        The only other major users are Uzbekistan with 100 tanks. Kazakhstan had 50 and took them out of service

        The T-64, like the T-80 was not exported.
        That still leaves ~5,000 T-64 that the USSR produced up until 1987

        The USSR was producing the T-55 up until 1981 - Russia probably easily has 30k sitting around

        The T-62's they are upgrading and returning to service stopped production in 1975 - with over 22,000 made.
        That tells me they are sitting on alot of 115mm ammo and AT-10 ATGM's that are probably lacking a use case compared to 100mm ammo used in the myriad of T-55 variants and AT guns

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          So so wrong on so many levels.
          Pathetic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >dies on tetanus

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >implying Ukraine is any better off

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    many even with pre-tossed turrets

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    and planes, maybe need some paint

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      APC's and Trucks are going to be easy tier, esp considering alot of Soviet APC's used low Horsepower automotive engines and you can literally swap in a modern V-8 or a COTS diesel from a car.

      BTR-50 had a single diesel V-6
      MT-LB used a diesel V-8
      BTR-60/70 used double gas 6-cylinder engines which were like 180hp combined
      BTR-80 made the switch to a single diese in the 220hp rangel but most of these are in service.
      A KPV barrel can be changed if its toast - alternatively they can drop in a KPPU or Kliver turret or asimilar

      Rusted shit is going to need to get blasted and a repaint.
      The biggest issue is going to be electrical, hydraulics, and suspension - this is unironically where tracked vehicles are going to have advantages - the BTR-50 and MT-LB are going to be relatively easier to restore in this state.

      As for aircraft?
      Mi-2's can be restored readily
      Mi-6 "Hook" was taken out of service due to the rotor fatigue life and would be a major issue - besides Mi-26 is still produced and is better in every way

      The old fighters?
      Fricktons of MiG-23/27 can be operationally restored as can Su-22M
      Older MiG's and Sukhoi's can potentially be turned into drones or loitering munitions - MiG-25 and Su-15 are ripe for this

      [...]
      Mi-2 would be easy to return to service - it was not a complicated rotorcraft and Russia has other engines it can swap into it

      Mig-17 when?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        MiG-17 were basically all exported away
        There were enough MiG-21 made that they could drone-fiy some to be useful in the SEAD role - if only to force a radar paint and eat a SAM for something like a Su-34 to respond to

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What are the lawn darts on the left row?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        scrap

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine shall tremble before the yak-28 bombing runs covered by mig-17 cap

      looks like they have some yak-15s too there so civilian airliners beware too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My peepee is hard now.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    also helicopters

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/dmN3bxQ.jpg

      and planes, maybe need some paint

      https://i.imgur.com/OnVEUmo.jpg

      many even with pre-tossed turrets

      https://i.imgur.com/OnVEUmo.jpg

      many even with pre-tossed turrets

      https://i.imgur.com/q5nxnyN.jpg

      there is still much old equipment

      https://i.imgur.com/1HkDR8r.jpg

      >russians gonna lose all of their equipment in this year

      sure?

      vely implessive. Now can we see them move?

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    all kind of vintage vehicles, carefully preserved

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What’s not to say that those “billions” have resulted in Russia’s humiliating stalemate?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking checked. I fricking hope all our money is spent on humiliating putler and killing as many vatniks as possible

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why do you turd worlders not grasp that a billion is pocket change to the American military?

    One of the last generation of our politicians had a joke/quote about this exact situation: "boy, you spend a billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money!"

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    After spending 1+trillion dollarinos in the Afghan adventures expansion pack having Russia military power implode for a few billion with no blood is the deal of the century.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Still waiting for the Ukrainians to throw down their weapons and join their Russian brothers. The West will never understand. And then
    >We'll all be dining in Kiev by tomorrow.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Think tank: trans rights are human right, white supremacy is the greatest threat to democracy
    >/k/: think tanks are meaningless bro, they're controlled by the israelites
    >Think tank: Russia is losing, Ukraine is winning
    >/k/: Based! Russia BTFO'd!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How's that divide and conquer strategy working out for you, Ivan?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >get upset at an obvious lie
      >agree with obvious truth
      >reeeee why are you acting differently
      You gays are pathetic

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I guess much ist just scrap metal.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      These tank hulls have been stripped of everything and most of them are cut in half for later disposal.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    2 more weeks my dudies, trust the plan.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    > If its just 0.04% why are we sending billions that way?
    It is undeniably funny to see an irredentist country with muh #2 army in the world that larps as the continuation of our former competitor invade their former vassal and get bogged down 20 miles away from the border
    Finest entertainment you can buy for… what, $250/person?

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You should be less worried about what it's costing Russia and what it's costing Ukraine. A lot of Ukrainian soldiers are dead too and and Russia can win a war of attrition. This is why NATO needs to stop with the bullshit, and just flood Ukraine with as much military hardware as possible. ATACMs fricking NOW.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >why are we sending billions that way?

    You are sending billions to your own manufacturing facilities to replace the outdated Bradleys you'll never actually use that you're tossing to Ukraine to fulfill your minimum commitments under the Budapest Memorandum. You are literally spending those billions on your own workers, own people, own army to fulfill your basic geopolitical objectives

    >B-BUT KEKER NEVER TOLD ME THIS

    Cucker was too busy shitting himself when his text messages leaked and it turns out he hates Trump more than most Democrats do.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      False.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How dare they help the US economy like that, we are conservatives we want to conserve the good old days of 2008

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    you mean when she bumbled about "100k dead officers" which is obviously implausible and her secretary later corrected it as 100k casualties

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >"100k dead officers" which is obviously implausible
      It included homogay nafo generals that got killed en-masse

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Stop foaming at the mouth.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The same woman who described Gepards defending the airspace with "tubes which can shoot very far away"?

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The 9 month battle that was supposed to last one week?

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What equipment?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      At least she seemed to genuinely care about those guys.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I just realized it was the second Russian woman who cared about other Russians I've seen since... Novodvorskaya?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oof. While Russia badly needs to lose this you can't help but feel for the poor fricking infantry being sent forward by a country which doesn't even have the decency to look after those it's sending to war.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If they keep it up, they'll keep getting fricked when China realizes it can carve its pound of flesh from Russian soil. Then the conscription could continue until half of Russia gets annexed and the other half gets laughed at.
        Not even I want Russian randos to get stomped by Chinks.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    To keep it at 0.04%. I hate foreign aid but this is the most efficient use of military dollars since WWII

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ukraine was expected to lose a year ago. Russia could officially win tomorrow and it’s still embarrassing

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    biggest battle of the war was in march of 2022 and russia got fricked. since then it's just a clean up which might take a while but result would be the same - russia has lost.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >biggest battle of the war so far.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Has there been a battle in this war with more casualties/resources committed?

      [...]
      biggest battle of the war was in march of 2022 and russia got fricked. since then it's just a clean up which might take a while but result would be the same - russia has lost.

      [...]
      Ukraine was expected to lose a year ago. Russia could officially win tomorrow and it’s still embarrassing

      Unfortunately for Ukraine it doesn't matter how a war begins. Russia underestimated them, got smacked early on, but it appears the tide has turned.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >memoryholing the Kyiv deathstack

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >select all units
          >click on objective

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >but it appears the tide has turned.
        Lol. Lmao

        Are the T-62s turning the tide? Or is it the shovels?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ukrainians are losing to prisoners with shovels? Dang.

          https://i.imgur.com/hvjqvUk.gif

          >but it appears the tide has turned.
          may we see it?

          Ukraine is currently losing the biggest battle of the war to prisoners with shovels.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Russia is completely depleted . its over.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Really? Can you show us the tide turning?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >but it appears the tide has turned.
        may we see it?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Has there been a battle in this war with more casualties/resources committed?
        Kyiv.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Argies too embarrassed to admit toilet percentage

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >taken far fewer casualties
    No they did not, homosexual. russia at this point is suffering 150k casualties and god knows how many are actually dead. I also wouldn't count on them having a good medical care to bring down the amount of preventable deaths or permanent injuries.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Kiev suffers over 100,000 fatalities in blackmutt
      >NO-O NO its you zigger
      So tiresome

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Go home then

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Esl

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not even WWII germany under day and night bombardment lost all their equipment, scarcity yes, not that many, yes, but we will always see vatnik vehicles and tanks.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >No mumbling either
    BUMbling, moron. and yes, she did say officers.
    Fricking hell, how does it feel to live with a brain like a chicken breast?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >lying
      The absolute state. She revealed the extent of casualties and it was deleted because it was supposed to be classified. Stay mad.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't want to jinx it one way or the other. Russians seem content at this point to attrit and solidify their own lines. Outside of the Donbas Oblast, they don't seem to be overly concerned about taking more ground.
    Even with 5:1 ratios, the Ukrainians have lost thousands of men too. Soon they are going to be 100% reliant upon NATO tech because such a large portion of their experienced soldiers will be crippled or dead.
    Remember that Ukraine needs to go on the OFFENSIVE, which almost always has higher casualties than the defender. Ukrainians seem to be more skilled the Russians, but they aren't a nation of Navy Seals and they are new to the equipment, so time will tell how well they can counter-attack.

    I will admit that I was full of super-hopium last fall after the collapse of Kharkiv and Kherson [city], but Le Butcher Man was actually semi-competent and the Russians have spent months now solidifying the lines and have more numbers now due to the draft.
    Euros have been asleep at the wheel for 30+ years now and they don't have half the Leopards to donate they were pretending they did. Honest to God, the best route for Ukraine to get tanks at this point is probably using Abrams, the USA has thousands sitting in storage and if we spent a couple billion we could set up a big refurbishing plant to add/remove certain pieces for export.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Outside of the Donbas Oblast, they don't seem to be overly concerned about taking more ground.
      They’re super concerned. Just not capable

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They just had an entire winter offensive across the donetsk and luhansk front
      I suppose you can argue that russia has some vague goal of securing the strip of land they have taken over, but they show desperation to kick ukies out of the rest of Donetsk and Luhansk

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    > And third, the Russians have taken far fewer casualties
    Nope. Cope.
    In terms of military casualties it’s pretty consistently been around a 1:7 to 1:10 ratio almost every day. Only way you could possibly argue that Ukraine has had more casualties is if you count all the civilians Russians have killed, but even that would likely be a stretch.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How do you know that if Ukrainian casualties are suppressed? Genuinely asking.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not that Anon but I'll take a shot. We don't know what Ukrainian casualties are. That said, we can make inferences based on logic, deductive reasoning, and publicly available evidence. What we do know:

        1. Ukraine is defending and has fortified the area. Giving them numerous advantages.
        2. Russia is attacking in human waves which is prone to high casualties.
        3. Russia no longer has massive artillery superiority.
        4. Video and photo evidence has come out showing big Russian casualties.
        5. Previous wars had much higher casualty rates for infantry assaulting fortified positions.
        8. Multiple claims from Ukrainian sources about positive casualty-to-loss rates.
        7. Russian mill blogger complaints about Russian casualties and poor tactics
        8. A lack of success on the ground for Russia.
        9. Ukraine's previous retreats when casualty-to-loss rates became unfavorable
        10. Near unanimous consensus among Ukrainians political and military leadership about defending Bakhmut
        11. No appreciable advantage in military skill among the attackers or defenders.

        How could Russia, without any significant advantages in aviation, artillery, vehicles, experience, etc.., be inflicting anywhere close to equal casualties while frontally assaulting fortified positions? This would also have to go against everything we know from history, OSINT data, and the reports from Russian sources and so on. If they were inflicting massive casualties on Ukraine, why hasn't Bakhmut fallen? Where are the photos to match the Russian dead? They should be making rapid advances with an equal casualty-to-loss rate. If f the loss rates are so poor, why hasn't Ukraine retreated? Ukraine doesn't have unlimited manpower, their leaders aren't idiots, they've retreated from bad situations before. There's more but you get the idea.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sorry, but all I can read there is “because I want it to be true”. If Ukrainian losses are so low why does the west suppress casualty figures? Why does so much of the go pro footage (often posted by foreign volunteers) reek of rank amateurism and often end in one for one losses? A few months ago defence analysts on mainstream news were happy to point out how high the Ukrainian losses were, but now they seem to not get asked about it.
          Ursula’s deleted claim of over 100k service deaths https://apa.az/en/europe/european-commission-deleted-the-part-from-ursula-von-der-leyens-address-on-death-of-more-than-100000-ukrainian-servicemen-updated-390674
          Are you seriously suggesting that Russia has lost between 500k - 700k and that’s a serious estimate? WP reckons it’s 120k Ukrainian to Russia’s 200k.
          https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/03/13/ukraine-casualties-pessimism-ammunition-shortage/
          >Russian bloggers
          And Ukrainian leaders are publicly calling for a withdrawal from bahkmut and saying they have no experienced soldiers left as they’ve all be killed
          >why hasn’t bahkmut fallen
          UK MoD posts have been talking about the Russian advances there
          Honestly getting tired of the stupidity of fan boys of both sides. I’ve just scrolled up and reread the moronic ratio claim. 10:1 - so a million Russians are dead? Ridiculous.
          I miss /k/.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > If Ukrainian losses......
            There is no reason to provide the enemy with intelligence. If it is low, and you want him to attack, why would you tell him? If it is high, and you don't want him to attack, why would you tell him?
            >Why does so much of the go pro.......
            I haven't seen any obvious difference in the professionalism of the combatants in released go pro footage, drone footage, or UAV footage. The vast majority of the footage released online and categorized by OSINT collectors for losses is dramatically in favour of Ukraine. Either Russians are supressing their successes, or they don't exist. I suggest you watch more footage.
            >A few months ago defence analysts.......
            That might be your perception, but it is not reflected in any serious analysis. Russia DID amplify a number of mistakes in western reporting (and politicians like Von der Leyens misspeaking) about Ukrainian casualties vs. KIA a few months back. They tried to amplify Ukrainians having 100K KIA when actual estimates were 100K casualties. Russia has done their best to spam 100K KIA everywhere they could. Further, casualties overall, are not casualties in Bakhmut. Ukraine might take big losses in Kherson, and much lower losses in Bakhmut for instance. Actual casualties estimates for the entire war vary but most estimates peg them around 400K for Russia and 130K for Ukraine. Around 30K dead+100K wounded for Ukraine and 140K dead + 260K wounded for Russia. Better training, equipment, medical access, evacuation, defending, etc.. accounts for the disparity in how many wounded survive. Don't forget, many wounded return to service
            >https://www.washingtonpost.....
            That article identifies a number of people attempting to correct the reporting while they were trying to write the article (about losses, strategy, etc..) , but the author refused to listen and instead went with their own narrative. Their unnamed source was attempting to elicit sympathy for more western support.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          makes sense

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No they actually have 3000 T14s and 1000 SU57s in reserve with the crews that aren’t brainlets, Z is in control trust the plan! Only 2 more weeks Zisters

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Romania worse off than Brazil
    Huechads keep winning

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you ever find that you're comparing yourself to Romania, you have already lost

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks Gypsies are something to measure yourself against
      Anon…

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    more russian rustbuckets

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao the difference is that Russia at least have gained territory this month. Ukies have lost just as much equipment and they have 0.04% less of their land despite their best efforts

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    But they killed 1 Predator drone

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's what you said last year.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *