Not that ROL would matter at that point but which weapons would be optimal to fight the Second American Civil War?
Assume HB 1808 passes and effectively any semiauto becomes unobtainium
Not that ROL would matter at that point but which weapons would be optimal to fight the Second American Civil War?
ATTN other anons, pic rel
A semiautomatic autoloading rifle, why do you think theyre trying to ban them? lol
>effectively any semiauto becomes unobtainium
What do you do for parts when it breaks
Raid a National Guard armory.
We don’t have parts on hand, we job our equipment to a FMS shop, CSMS, or MATES. They then order the parts and install them. We also don’t keep ammo on hand because Kent State
I think you're dramatically overestimating the period between HB 1808 being signed into law and a hypothetical civil war.
sks doesn't break
You only have one ?
Is you serious homie? Whens the last time something broke on your gun, if ever? If your not a hamfisted jarhead and dont throw your rifle around like a fricking football then it should last for years. In the event something DOES break then you should already have a repair kit consisting of various pins, springs, extractors, firing pins, etc and the tools to fix them, if if gets fubar then just ditch it and get a new rifle. Your rifle breaking down is the least of your concerns.
Same as machine gun owners who can keep their old ass transferables working.
Parts aren’t firearms.
>t.old ass AR MG owners
muh dick
I think it's best to sit this one out boys, just hand the weapons in and buy bolt actions instead. If they infringe further then we start shooting OK?
Hahaha wait theres an AWB coming? 3 weeks? Frick where have I been?
>Hahaha wait theres an AWB coming? 3 weeks? Frick where have I been?
its not coming. its the same AWB scare that the news trots out every year.
It's actually the first time one passed the House since 1994. It has the president's approval, of course, so the only thing holding it up is ten Senators.
Unlike a lot of doomsaying fatalists I don't believe this senators will cave (look how good senators are at obstructing shit for decades) but it's not good to ignore how close it came this cycle because it went much farther through the hoops than the biennial Sheila Jackson Lee tantrum usually does
Makes me sick every time I see some butthole on /k/ shilling for this homosexual. Especially because I know at least a couple of them aren't just being contrarian trolls.
>to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited
They're not even trying to hide it anymore.
>to ensure that the right to bear arms is not unlimited
oh my god they really said it, they said the thing!
>don't believe this senators will cave
I do, they're all talking heads with no spines. Enough cotton paper persuasion will make those worthless fricks do anything.
Its
, for clarity
It's not 4D chess - shitlibs are already wailing and gnashing their teeth over its failure.
>I do, they're all talking heads with no spines. Enough cotton paper persuasion will make those worthless fricks do anything.
There's no chance in hell that all the dems in southern states vote for it. That's a political death sentence and they need all of them to pass it.
>they need all of them
It's 60 vote margin, not 50 vote
So they need all of them, plus ten Republicans
So there was literally never a chance of this passing then. Why is everyone freaking out?
Because it passed the House for the first time in 28 years
It's more fun than doomposting
We've never had an illegal ~~*occupation*~~ government this blatant before
>Mr. COHEN
Cohen Act
>I grew up hunting
>As a gun owner myself
>I support the 2nd Amendment but
J*nnies won’t let us discuss gun control, even though more people die every year from putting things up their asses than assault rifles
I'd actually be interested in seeing this statistic, cause if true that's fricking hilarious.
Oh, so it's a nothingburger? What the frick is the point of trying to pass a law that you already know is doomed in the first place? Or is it a form of "see how far it goes to give everyone a good sp00k"?
Is our governing body truly autistic enough to waste time and money on something that they knew from the starting line would flop?
Somewhat rhetorical.
>What the frick is the point of trying to pass a law that you already know is doomed in the first place?
because it lets you say you 'fight for gun control' in your ad campaigns.
This. Neither side wants to give up their cushy position in the Washington Uniparty and have to miss out on all the trips to child brothels in the Ukraine or luxury flights to Epstein Island
> I'd actually be interested in seeing this statistic, cause if true that's fricking hilarious.
I’m not even joking, more children are kidnapped (thanks podesta and epstein), more people are stabbed and more die from medical malpractice than ARs and AKs combined.
The media just likes to focus on what fits their agenda which is why there are still a bare minimum of five articles a day about the January sixth protests putting the helpless politicians in danger but not monkey lives matter destroying people’s homes.
If I may be annoying and play whatabout, I'd point out how the Republican Congress sent a "Repeal Obamacare" bill to Obama's desk every day for six years, in spite of him mysteriously not signing it.
The US legislative system really is bullshit even BEFORE accounting for corruption and incompetence - On a more /k/ note New Jersey residents won a reprieve last month as the State Assembly passed a body armor ban, then instead of sending it to the Governor to sign it got "tabled indefinitely."
The only possible rationale I can think of is that they want to enjoy all the benefits of claiming "We don't want mass shooters to have body armor" without having to deal with the fallout of saying "Every soccer mom who bought a kevlar backpack at Office Depot is now a felon"
>yes americans do really
As far as I can tell, body armor is legal everywhere on earth except for Australia and New York
Astonishingly enough, even in China; they explicitly allow "armoured or protective equipment, constructions and components when accompanying their user for the user's own personal protection" which sounds like they don't mind you wearing it but don't want you stockpiling it or building one of those Mad Max trucks or something
How would it get through the Senate
Or the supreme Court
anything that shoots even .22's and flintlock muskets and rifles
>Second American Civil War
its never gonna happen so just get a job already.
>its never gonna happen
Just like how Russia would never invade Ukraine, right? Right?
>Just like how Russia would never invade Ukraine,
i don't think that was ever a thing people were saying would never happen.
>right? Right?
why are you talking like a bot
it won't stand up to Bruen criteria, but we'd have to wait a year or so for it to get to SCOTUS while it fricking ruins everyone's livelihood in the industry
I support the bill. My $800 LE6920 becomes a $3000 "pre-ban" collector's item overnight.
Not my fault you're poor, sucks to suck.
>Benitez about to btfo CA and other 9th circuit states by ruling AWB unconstitutional
>NJ mag ban about to get btfo in court because of Bruen
Will we finally be free bros?
any court that upholds unconstitutional gun laws will get appealed to scotus. it's just a waiting game
>whoopsie doodle Clarence Thomas went in the forever box due to climate change, all hail chief justice La'queefduh Kacka-Ah-Ah-An Wakanda Steinberg
>and effectively any semiauto becomes unobtainium
Anyone who thinks this would happen is a cum golem without a functioning brain. There are so many fricking guns in the US that they could magically stop all manufacturing and slowly confiscate over a period of like 200 years whenever someone dies or gets arrested and there would still be millions upon millions of guns still in circulation.