Are there any Soviet/Russia planes which are actually considered good?

Pic is the Su-22

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    no

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    MiG-29 was quite advanced when it was first introduced

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, it wasn't.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >first fighter with HMD
        yeah it was

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's what the propaganda told you? Do you believe you're winning in Bakhmut, too? VatBlack person

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            anon, are you ok? is this a new vatBlack person false flag tactic?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yes. They are trying to make Ukraine supporters look irritating. See

              Russhit fascists must die

              have a nice day commie

              I hate Russians but you can’t deny the MiG-21 or the Su-27 don’t look cool

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's not new, anon. They have been doing it for most of the conflict.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The HGU-30 VTAS predates the Fulcrum's helmet cue sight by fifteen years.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >HMD
          HMS, and a rudimentary one at best. Not to mention the USN's VTAS program had already been developed, tested, improved, and canceled (a mistake to be fair) in the early 1970s.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    MiG-21 was considered good when it came out. I-16 was also pretty good for a 1933 plane.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    AN-2

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    have a nice day you vatBlack person piece of shit. Why don't you go to die in Bakhmut instead of spamming the board with shitty vatBlack person threads?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      low effort falsegayging

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    MiG-15
    Su-27

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Probably easier to list the ones which really weren't anything great: (early) MiG-19s, MiG-23, Su-7, Tu-22 (not the M versions), a stretch but maybe also the MiG-25.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      MiG-25 with western materials would’ve been a beast but the Soviets built it out of melted down cooking pans and made it too fat

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No polacks, your plane is old and shitty. You need to increase your military spending and replace them with the F-15EX. Boeing needs more contracts.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      those coffins are flying only because Poland is expected to maintain air-force of nearly 200 aircraft - those would be scrapped if not for that reason - same with hinds actually

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        They have a contract with Boeing to replace the Mi-24 with AH-64. Now need another contract from Boeing for the F-15EX to replace Su-22.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Give them the A-10. It'll be funny, I promise.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            A10 should be retrofitted as ground based anti-air. Flip plane upside-down, put on turret, put SAMs on the hard points and connect a radar to it.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    have a nice day commie

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >168.webm
      >169.webm
      Interesting...

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        ye

        have a nice day commie

        Russhit fascists must die

        post 'em all, kind sir

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russhit fascists must die

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    MIG-15 and 17 were very good bomber interceptors. Not so good at air superiority but that wasn't what they were designed for and not what the pilots trained for.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      US and Soviet fighters were pretty well matched back then but once the F15 entered it was over for the Soviets and they never came up with a capable counter to it. Russian Federation produced nothing of quality

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Also the Su-57 is as stealthy as a Super Hornet. lol

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    there are lots of good soviet veichles, the problem comes that oonce they are introduced the us shits out a veichle that is better in any way.
    >mig-15 was pretty good
    >f-86 gets upgraded so much that becomes better than the mig-15 in any way possible

    >mig-21 is pretty good
    >f-4 gets upgraded and pilot trained so much that it's not a contest anymore

    >mig-29/su-27 is pretty good
    >f-18 does everything the mig-29 can do but better and carrier operated
    >f-15c/e
    >f-16c
    >aim-7M

    the only difference now with russia is that now produces already outdated veichles
    >su-57 gets introduced
    >900+ f-35 already exist

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the only difference now with russia is that now produces already outdated veichles
      same thing was already true when the mig-29 and su-27 came out. at that time the f-15 was alreadyin service for nearly a decade

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        When the Mig-29 entered service, the F-16 only had short range IR missiles and the F-15 had no chaff or flare

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          while the fulcrum posed a new threat which had to be adapted to it certainly wasnt better then f-15 or f-14 my point still stands

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only part I don't agree with is the mig 15 (and subsequently the 17, since it's basically a 15 on roids). The 86 for the most part was inferior to the 15, it's saving grace being very good pilots compared to the ones it faced

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    the best was obviously the La-7

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    By today's standards? Maybe only the SU-35 and the SU-57.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The MiG-15 was the last Soviet/Russian plane that could trade remotely evenly with its American counterpart.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Going way back, the Ilyushin Il-2, and the Yak-3.

    As far as the post WWII stuff, the MIG-21

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    MiG 15 was a match for the Sabre and the Yak 9 was a pretty okay late piston fighter

    The newer you go the more advanced electronic miniaturization matters and the further the Soviets fell behind

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd honestly call the Yak-3 a better plane than the Yak-9

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Initially during the cold war the MiG-21 and the MiG-29 were quite capable as well as the MiG-25 although they were bested almost immediately (within a matter of months in some cases).

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There are many, both when they were introduced and now. Today I'd say mig31, su 35 and su 34 are effective planes.

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Su-22 is a shit plane and the polish air force would be the first to say it. A fundamentally deeply flawed plane right from the design stage

    You could have said flanker or something but mot this

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    MiG-15 was a good match against the F-86. Things go downhill from there, and Soviet aircraft gradually get worse and worse in comparison to their Western counterparts due to the West's edge in electronics. The end result is the massive capability gap between F-35 the Su-57.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mig-15 for it's time
    Mig-21 for it's time.
    Mig-29
    Su-27 and it's family
    Mi-8 helicopter and it's family

    Just look at what has been widely exported. If it sees commercial success, there must be a reason.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes, and the reason is because russia is selling junk to gullible brown people with the promise that it will make them global contender

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *