Are paratroopers obsolete or are Russians just retarded?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    paratroopers have always been obsolete

    every successful use of paratroopers in history was personally done by god himself because he thinks it's really funny that people keep falling for it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The virgin fallschirmjäger vs. the Chad Cretan Shepherd.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Dug in enemy vs paratroopers with handguns.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >greek bvll
        >defeated in 13 days by outnumbered paratroopers with no naval landing support

        Yes, the casualties numbers shocked the Luftwaffe, but that was before Barbarossa when Germans were used to taking whole countries with minimal losses. In Crete the Allies still suffered about the same number of killed as the Axis despite being on the defending side of an airborne invasion.

        >In contrast, the Allies were impressed by the potential of paratroopers and started to form airborne-assault and airfield-defence regiments.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Are paratroopers obsolete or are Russians just retarded?
    Yes to both

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Both

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It entirely depends on how paratroopers are used, they fill a strategic role

    Small commando paratroopers to drop behind enemy lines for sabotage and insurgency purposes?
    Based

    A well supplied paratrooper corps in an air superiority environment after a SEAD and CAS campaign used to capture and hold strategic points like airports?
    Super based

    Using your paratroopers as light infantry or using your paratroopers without total air domination?
    Suicide

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The fundamental problem of paratroopers is they need immediate resupply or they literally starve to death.

      Modern war is won and lost on logistics. So dumping troops where they can't get access to bullets and rations is EXTREMELY risky.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That’s why you need absolute air dominance and you either use a smaller force that can be resupplied by air for operations in the enemy rear (commandos) or use your paras to capture strategic points which can be resupplied in a few days (bridges, airports)
        Paras are a modern, mobile asset that no modern army should lack of but they should not be a massive army branch

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        do you really expect paratroopers to hold out for weeks on end?
        or do you think paratroopers operate entirely on their own without any other force?

        paratroopers were used extensively on d-day succesfully to secure roads and bridges to slow down german response time and speed up the advance out of the beach
        most linked up within a day of the landings and the rest within less than a week

        they were used in the textboox example of how paratroopers operate
        inserted via air to take specific obectives with total surprise on their side
        they obviously couldnt liberate paris by themselves, but they didnt have to

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh look, a good post. Congratulations.

          https://i.imgur.com/IsQxAiY.jpg

          This post could only be written by a Russian, which is funny because all ruskie shills hide behind USA flags on 4chan.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > Are paratroopers obsolete

    Battle of Kitona says no. Battle of Dragon Rouge says no. Battle of Tangail says no. operation serval says no.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think Tangail should be brought up as an example since by that point, the Pakistanis were extremely undersupplied, undermanned and demoralized. iirc the Indian paratroopers suffered 0 casualties, then linked up with Kader Siddiqui's militia, before conducting a forced march to Dhaka's entrance bridge to receive the Pakistani surrender. It was pretty much a walkover.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >operation serval
      lmao that wasn't even paratrooper operation

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        sugoi

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Russians are idiots.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Hostomel raid was initially a success, and honestly could have seriously ended the war had the plan outside just taking the airbase worked. However, the ground assault from Belarus was stalled enough for Ukraine to bring out artillery to shell not just the VDV but also make the airstrip useless. So, my vote is that the Russians are retarded and they, in a way, Market Garden'd themselves.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >VDV wont be briefed on the assault until the fucking night of
      >our resupply from belarus to kiev will go unopposed
      Even Market Garden and Crete werent that outlandishly dumb

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >initially a success
      Why do people still buy this? It was an abject failure because they had no chance of protecting the runways, which were being concurrently targeted by both artillery and Ukrainian air force. The reason that reinforcements didn't arrive wasn't because of the VDV getting turned into a red paste (who cares lol), it was because the runways were completely unusable within an hour of the invasion commencing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Suppression of artillery is literally not the VDVs job. The airfield WAS taken and cleared of trucks which is why the Ukrainians hit it with artillery.

        >WHAT AIRFORCE DOING?!

        I don't get why the propaganda drums are still beating on this when Ukraine itself has posted an in depth analysis of the battle of hostomel to include POW accounts. Just weird as it serves no purpose to admit the initial success when the battle for Kiev is over.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I often wonder what happened to that VDV poster guy.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The guy in the music videos? That's Alexander Buinov, he's not actual VDV.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >That's Alexander Buinov, he's not actual VDV.
            Haha, so the most famous face of the VDV was an ex-boyband neverserved now politician.
            Guess that's why he wants to send them.

            Thanks anon

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Dude's a Z-musician/singer. There's several other Russian celebs that effectively had to do the equivalent of towing the party line as the very special operation started. They went from being depoliticized™ to being mega ziggers because of where they get their money and support from.

              Have some actual VDV guys from over a decade ago:

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not even an actual soldier, just a pro-putin musician

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The Hostomel raid was initially a success
      bro are you retarded? no plane could land how was that successful?

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, but not always. Were they a desperate measure? Absolutely. Back when you had anti air chewing up Jumpers, you'd have a decent amount who could still hit the ground.

    You duct tape a steak knife to a drone, it'll litter the ground with about 3,000 lbs of manwich before anyone's the wiser.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      LET THE BODIES HIT THE

      **DSHH DSSHH***
      FLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooOoooOoooOoooOooooOoooooooOoooooooOOOOOORRR

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Paratroopers should be a ground unit of the air force and directly subject to air force command
    Marines should also be part of the navy and under navy command

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look at Soviet airborne operations during WWII. They were all complete failures so they ended up using them exclusively as "elite" infantry. They still cling to this mentality, so when they're used like they're supposed to be used they end up getting slaughtered.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They still cling to this mentality
      Except they conducted a successful heliborne drop in a peer threat environment against a pre alerted enemy in what is the longest distance operation ever conducted. They also overwhelmed, dislodged the guarding forces, and forced multiple brigades to be brought from Kiev itself to rout them during a time when the initial ground invasion was attempting to push the capitol.

      Had anything gone wrong for the Ukrainian defenders there was a damn good chance of the land bridge being effective.

      The Soviets were some of the first to form airborne infantry and they're still one of the most willing to try novel things and take risks with them today.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >in a peer threat environment

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >unable to prevent/dislodge enemy arty from destroying the massive strategic objective they were tasked with capturing
        >don't get resupplied in time
        >forced to retreat into the surrounding woods and wiped to the man
        Yeah the VDV did great anon

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Tbh the last two weren't their fault, but more the planners who failed to take in to account *any* form of resistance to the relief column

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >peer threat environment
        remember when this "SMO" was supposed to be over in 3 days because of how stronk Russia is compared to little Ukraine?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          neither of them are "peer opponents"

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not to the US, but apparently, Ukraine is a peer to Russia based on the ziggers' performance in this definitely-not-an-invasion. Before this clusterfuck, I would've bet money that Russia could make us bleed if we went to war with them. I also thought that they were really going to annex Ukraine in about a week. This is why I don't gamble in Vegas

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >conducted a successful heliborne drop
        Delusional. They NEVER secured the airport, and they were BTFO when they tried to attack Kiev via Irpin. They achieved NONE of their objectives.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They only work in places where distances are fukhueg (meaning road vehicles are impractical), and local troop concentration is low.
    So basically Africa.

    Captcha: N0GS8

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh look, a good post. Congratulations.
      [...]
      This post could only be written by a Russian, which is funny because all ruskie shills hide behind USA flags on 4chan.

      >a one-way trip
      They always inadvertently out themselves

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not obsolete, but risky and very niche. Russians were too confident.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russians are retarded.
    If you apply them correctly, in that they be deployed in a way that they sow chaos in the enemy's rear line, interrupt logistical flow, and capture key targets, prior to linking up with heavier support slamming in to the main line, they work exceptionally well.
    The problem is that Russia got the first half right, then forgot the latter, then dropped them in the ocean, then flew them over the enemy's capital accidentally and got them shot down, then condemned them to being front line shot-callers and emergency rear guard units when they got too thin in numbers to do their job.
    Oh yeah, they're also good as emergency relief forces for any cut off or surrounded units.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Paratroopers r still based

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So is Balalika.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        true

        ?t=24

        https://i.imgur.com/q8TIRRQ.gif

        Damn, just imagine if Balalaika sits with her eyes cold stare in some island paradise hotel. Her perfect tits bounce and up and down and then the phone rings.
        She suddenly starts to chole you really hard. The only thing you hear before pass out is:"The fucking monkeh did what in Ukraine with my VDV?".
        Just imagine how mad she would be and lash out by putting your head between her thighs.

        haha very funny scenario anon, I like to self insert as Chang and in this scenario it makes sense

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, just imagine if Balalaika sits with her eyes cold stare in some island paradise hotel. Her perfect tits bounce and up and down and then the phone rings.
      She suddenly starts to chole you really hard. The only thing you hear before pass out is:"The fucking monkeh did what in Ukraine with my VDV?".
      Just imagine how mad she would be and lash out by putting your head between her thighs.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I approve of this post

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        use inspect element on it for a good ciopy of the captcha image

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >light infantry dropped behind enemy lines and fighting regular infantry and armor without support.
    this was always high risk manoeuvrer - if help came in time it was a success - otherwise Khorne was really pleased...

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Today VdV exist only on paper kek
    Maybe they will mobilize a little bit more skuffs (ruzzoids alcoholics with beer body 40+ yo which served in the vdv 10+ years ago)

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are a high risk high reward and you can not deploy them willimy nilly as russia does and expect them to survive.
    One example of their usage :
    >Basically you found an airdefense gap or created it your self and you toss them over to halt enemy reinforcements so other troops can break through the lines by sabotage, digging in, improvised ambushes or fighting retreats.
    Paratroopers can buy you time in an offensive and reduce casualtyes by creating an obsticle .
    >Or they can be used to quickly take strategically important objectives that the opponet did not have the time to take, but reinforcements must arrive in time.
    >If you use them as well trained troops , years of parachute and behind the lines training/specialist training is not utilised.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Any scenario that would fuck up paras kills gunships just as bad, yet nobody bats an eye at the horrible attrition helos had in Nam' or how quickly they get swatted out of the sky now.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >take battle hardened elite troops and shove them in the meat grinder like diseased cattle
    This country is wasting away as we watch

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Paratroopers exist to suffer anon. Look at most paratrooper operations throughout history and they're the first to get rekt. The few times they're successful are the exceptions to the norm.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Both

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Paratroopers have been obsolete since their inception. In virtually every conflict they've participated they've taken enormous casualties and rarely achieved their objectives.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *