Are nato AA missile defense so Bad or the modern Russian missiles are so good.
Or maybe both?
Kiev has the best aa systems from usa, Germany and France and they still can't deal with Russian Cruise missiles and hypersonic balístic missiles.
Are nato AA missile defense so Bad or the modern Russian missiles are so good. Or maybe both?
You can't really deal with kinetic force going straight down onto target. You would need immediate response or net.
Good morning Sirs, please do the needful
Russia beating modern Nato equipment with ww2 weapons, how sad, isn't that right PrepHoleope?
Most of West weapons are over designed trash that meant to suck up resources. There are handful of good systems and weapons. Russia focus on cheap and reliable systems.
ESL moron
You can't say the n word.
my bad
I am severely demoralized, will contact my representative to tell him to stop donating to Ukraine tomorrow
They should donate more so all that money goes into trash. Fool and his money are soon to be parted
indeed. now that they've been proven to be useless junks. we just should dump the remainder of our stock to ukraine. surely russia won't mind that now.
Well of course they're ineffective against Kirby, he's defeats an Eldritch God like every game
>"The Patriot missile system is really designed to go after ballistic missiles. It is not as effective on cruise missiles, and it certainly cannot be effective against drones," Kirby stated to CNN, adding that possibilities to fend off hypersonic missiles are "limited."
>Kirby described fighting hypersonic missiles as "very, very difficult" but also did not hesitate to add that it would not "surprise" him if "Ukrainian air defenses are limited in their ability to go after hypersonic missiles."
So what he's actually saying, you disingenous brown garden gnome, is that it won't be effective against hypersonic missiles that we havent even seen used yet and that it won't be effective against drones (No shit, that's not what it's for).
Learn to read, moron.
Patriot systems have 10% success rate even against the weaponry they claim to deflect. And also they are impossible to repair since only Americans have blueprints, spare parts and engineers who understand wiring system since all the wires are white and unable to be identified.
you are retarded, clueless
Americans are testing weapons in my country. Every single one of them failed even the rc car robot bomb which controls stopped working for no reason
>An AA missile platform designed against ballistic missiles isnt good against drones and low-flying cruise missiles
What NOOOOOOOO HOW COULD IT BEEEEE
Meanwhile IRIS-T is fucking dunking on russhit missiles with 100% accuracy
If NATO AA is so bad then why is Russia targeting cities and not military targets?
They target electric infrastructure in Kiev.
>If NATO AA is so bad then why is Russia targeting cities and not military targets?
>American shit
>Ineffective
Who could've expected. Maybe USA should've instead paid France/Germany to "donate" more equipment.
Brown monkeys are so fucking hilarious holy shit. I can't wait for months of cope when russians retreat.
Yes NATO AA is so shit 90% of vatnik missiles get shot down, drones are so ineffective even Kremlin shills are no longer talking about muh Iranian wunderwaffe and russian air force literally stopped existing in this conflict half a year ago.
Actually I've read that Ukrainian interceptions have gone down lately.
So no idea if Russia is just oversaturating so much or what. Also some Gepards seem to be moving towards the front, so counterattack soon I guess.
Russian weapons were always much more better than western analogues.
You literally see it on videos dumbshit. Barely anything gets through AA around Kiev.
They have like a dozen modern western SAM systems they can't protect 3/4 of their territory. Where they are literally nothing gets through. You get occasional building hit by falling wreckage that's it.
Also this shit barely matters russians have enough missiles left for one major attack every two weeks.
>Al Mayadeen
Good job posting an article by a pro-Russian, anti-western propagandist channel.
Patriots have always been shit
No. The source to the article is a retard, and you are all retarded for not recognising the pure lolcow of a source that is Kirby.
>author is a pro RU gay
>selective evidences and misrepresentations
>OP being a gay as usual
The patriot is designed to shoot down ballistic missiles, which goes on a much higher altitude than a cruise missile/drones. If you want to shoot down cruise missiles, then you need short-medium range AA. Using long range AA is counter productive because they fulfill a specific niche.