something i noticed as well. the taller paratroopers seemed to have back/knee problems more often. that being masstac combat jumps havent been used for awhile and i dont seem them being used all that often in the future
which is why i included the the vehicle observation. at some point they will have to cram into a track or truck if regardless if they jump or air assault and they just dont fit
>urban environments
The same environments that require you to be really good at sprinting from building to building? The last thing you wanna be in an urban environment is slow.
lol you triggered the manlets >women will always prefer and pursue 6’+ >lanklet genes will always carry on and dominate for that reason alone
There is an absolute correlation between trans and manlets, at a certain point they realize they are more suited to femininity.
Who gives a fuck about what women want when there's 20 guys shooting at you?
It's true that tall guys have a pretty big mobility advantage, especially when there's lots of buildings to use for cover. Mobility will save your life more than anything else.
>Who gives a fuck about what women want when there's 20 guys shooting at you?
im 6'+ and because im not the ideal soldier like you with your sub 6' frame i stay home and fuck your sister and spread my tall genes everywhere while you sit in your trench with 20 guys unloading onto you
What’s the point of spreading your tall genes around when 99% of the earth population is going to suffocate in 140 years and your tall ancestors will not be living in space because of the additional calorie and size requirements?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>140 years
bro that is so far away its resonable that my grandchildren wont be alive by then
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
It is what it is bro. It’s when the thing happens. The 100 years leading up to it aren’t much better.
I am talking specifically about the white population of America, though admittedly a lot of the studies don't accurately differentiate between Hispanics and whites, which probably skews it a bit
Quality is better than quantity Anon, and most women will have to settle for sub-6’ based off statistics alone.
Tbh I feel bad for them, imagine wanting to get a absolutely mogged by a 6’3”+ giant that can throw you around and bruise your cervix only to end up with some manlet with a lifting obsession. Tragic.
This has nothing to do with the positive qualities of a soldier
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Being more attractive than the natives you're occupying is one of the most important qualities a soldier can have.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>being bigger and stronger and more preferable to women has nothing to do with the qualities of a soldier
Ok anom
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Stronger to drive what exactly? Soldiers basically all carry the same load within their specific roles. Shorter levers are more mechanically efficient and as someone pointed out earlier less prone to injury from repeated impacts like rucking under heavy load or jumping out of planes. You're not going to be beating your enemies to death.
Look at (literally) movie star handsome Audie Murphy up there, wearing every medal for heroism the United States military had. Are you trying to tell me that guy didn't fuck? He spread his 5 foot 5 inch genes across three continents.
Tall men won't be able to fit in the exosuits without them being designed too big to fit through a door or maneuver indoors. Size is a hard limiter here and being able to go inside human buildings and use cover is mandatory.
The warrior of the future is a short gamer manlet.
>but noo we cant just make the exosuits 6” taller! >that would be impossible!
Manlet cope. Bigger soldier, bigger exosuit, better results.
Manlet loses every time.
>bigger mass = bigger inertia
This is bad because? You're doubling down on what people were already saying.
Taller soldiers with bigger exosuits will be significantly faster and be able to cover significantly more distance in a shorter amount of time (which is what actually matters on a futuristic battlefield)
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Physics.
Imagine scaling skyscrapers as a 6’7 lanklet. The future battlefield is in skyscrapers so hardcore parkour is needed.
And you’re fucking retarded, I haven’t met someone who is 6’5 and could run fast. Usain Bolt isn’t an exception. If you play soccer, or any sport in general manlets are the best because they can run really fast in short bursts. Lanklet cope.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Don’t bother, Anon.
Manlets are insufferably insecure and have to retreat to various sci-fi/fantasy scenarios and imagined technical jargon in order to justify their existence.
See
I read a scifi short story where everyone on earth genetically engineered themselves to be minimum size midgets to save on living space, food, etc. They were hunting down the last remaining giants (normal humans) on the planet trying to exterminate their wasteful kind forever. It was primarily a psychological thing, the tall humans couldn't be allowed to exist without the midgets feeling ridiculous.
What I'm trying to say here is that we need to be careful.
i think we could apply the combined arms team concept for future ground forces,
essentially:
- Main Battle Soldier = 5'8 manlet (not too tall, not too short, just right) for general infantry, and for the main battlefield.
- Light Soldier = 5'5 manlet (trained to do backflips and parkour and can run really fast)
- Heavy Duty Soldier = 6'7 BVLL for lifting heavy weapons and a larger exoskeleton, therefore more room for heavier payload
they will all work in tandem with each other, but Heavy soldiers will be less common, because the Main Battle Soldier fills in general purpose. Light soldier for reconnaissance and tunnel rat duties.
Absolute cope.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
holy cope
being tall and strong doesnt matter if the future battlefield has lasers with pinpoint accuracy, along with infantry mounted radar systems, manlets have a smaller radar cross signature and are more stealthier than lanklets
Here is your battlefield.
It is nothing but sinking mud, jagged rocks, ruined buildings, felled trees and barbed wire as far as the eye can see.
Half the time in battle you are either knee-deep in some soggy farmland, swamp, blown-to-bits forest or rubbled city-scape. You CAN NOT run it! There is no firm surface to place your foot on. You will not be zipping through it like some damn usain bolt.
The rest of the time you will be in some ditch, trench, behind sandbags in a FOB or you are inside some building. And you will always be wearing 40 pounds of weapons and equipment. Either way, you won't be skipping like fucking sonic the hedgehog.
Also there will be some motherfucker with a LMG or a sniper across that field. Being small and nible is the key in today's war.
>watch footage from Ukraine >it's nothing like this
I don't care how war was waged 100+ years ago when we're talking about today's wars. 99% of what Ukrainian soldiers are doing is just fucking running around.
No, Ukrainians are the ones doing the smart thing: digging in and hosing those muddy fields with LMG's. It's the russians who try to run across the fields, get stuck in mud and get shot to sieves or blown to pieces by mortars/artillery. Although admittedly their own retarded human wave doctrines are to blame for this.
Being a big, tall mofo or running around in the open just makes you an obvious target. Just look at the picture. How the fuck are you going to run across that muddy field if there is a guy with a gun on the other side? You being Usain Bolt doesn't help one.
For most jobs in the military, 170-175 cm are optimal. Being larger usually comes with more drawbacks than benefits. You eat more, take up more space and the strength benefit is marginal. There are exceptions, but they are mostly with artillery crew and crew served organic weapons.
There never was a use for 185 cm soldiers other than parading them in front of some foreign diplomats or loading very big shells into artillery pieces.
Yes. You save space and they are easier to carry. It is also a good thing for society to get rid of excess males in war, especially the defective ones.
Do you call a massgrave full of manlets a massgrave or something else?
>Women want tall guys, but men don't want tall women.
wtf guys, why would you seek short women? All you guys say how being tall is fucking awesome, but instead of seeking tall women, you go for women who are shorter than sometimes much shorter than you.
Why would you handicap your future kids like that?
If guys pursued tall women especially women taller than themselves, we would have giants walking the earth. Imagine an entire world filled with 9 foot tall Robert Wadlows.
Because humans have for a very long time functioned on very limited calories.
Women want tall men because tall men are better at providing food.
Men want short women because they're easier to provide for.
>dies at 22 due to health complications >requires leg braces throughout his entire life
You know I'm fine being a manlet if gravity is going to fuck my anatomy that hard when I get that tall
Because they're quadrupeds and can spread that weight of a larger body over a greater area both internally and externally. Plus their anatomy is uniquely geared for heat dissipation which is a massive issue when your body gets that big
>plus their anatomy is uniquely geared for heat dissipation which is a massive issue when your body gets that big
I doubt humans, the species with the best thermoregulation on earth will have an issue with this.
Also we've seen massive bipeds in the past, from a physics standpoint we could still get a lot taller than we currently are.
to be fair, Wadlow couldn't feel pain anymore and thus died from a minor leg infection from his braces. If he or somebody noticed the leg infection sooner, he or someone else would be more self-aware of his health/surroundings and Wadlow could've lived a much longer life.
Also, Wadlow kept on growing throughout his entire life. By the time he would've lived to 30, he could've been 12 foot tall.
There would've come a point where his anatomy could no longer sustain that unending growth. Honestly I wish he lived longer to see what the limit of our current anatomy can support and what happens when we go beyond the edge of what our hearts, lungs, and skeletons can support. At what point does it all collapse in on itself
DARPA glows are making Nephilim morons real Kenny. That's what the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan was all about. Retrieving Nimrod's corpse and the Giants of Kandahar's to splice up their genes to bring forth and manifest the real Anti-Christ. Not an act or a ceremonious antichrist like the Pope or Mr. Beast youtube man. The Real McCoy.
Because being tall is a meme on the battlefield, this isn't a basketball game anon. Boldness, good strategy, accurate application of weapons, and strength of will are the factors that make good soldiers.
I read a scifi short story where everyone on earth genetically engineered themselves to be minimum size midgets to save on living space, food, etc. They were hunting down the last remaining giants (normal humans) on the planet trying to exterminate their wasteful kind forever. It was primarily a psychological thing, the tall humans couldn't be allowed to exist without the midgets feeling ridiculous.
What I'm trying to say here is that we need to be careful.
i think we could apply the combined arms team concept for future ground forces,
essentially:
- Main Battle Soldier = 5'8 manlet (not too tall, not too short, just right) for general infantry, and for the main battlefield.
- Light Soldier = 5'5 manlet (trained to do backflips and parkour and can run really fast)
- Heavy Duty Soldier = 6'7 BVLL for lifting heavy weapons and a larger exoskeleton, therefore more room for heavier payload
they will all work in tandem with each other, but Heavy soldiers will be less common, because the Main Battle Soldier fills in general purpose. Light soldier for reconnaissance and tunnel rat duties.
You're not going far enough. Imagine platoons of these fuckers hiding in garbage cans, mailboxes and vietnam-style underground tunnel networks that your soldiers literally can never fit into. Imagine every helicopter dropping off 30 of these dudes rather than 8 normal guys. Imagine every jet and ship and tank needing half as much space allotted for crew. The tactical advantage is overwhelming.
But imagine how quickly they'd get overpowered by the 12 foot tall super soldiers wearing their spartan armor that can effortlessly defeat the manlet low energy weaponry. Sure, they can hide but they'll get blasted immediately the moment they fire a shot at the enemy.
5'2" Supermanlet here. Gymnastics is fun and guns are fun. Both parents navy, but I'm just a larper. I like and am dating to a tall woman. I hope my child is either tall with my broad shoulders or short with my shoulders. I fear him coming out a tall lanklet like my cousins and uncles.
You've probably heard of the strange phenomenon that more males are born after wars. But did you know that the most likely explanation for that is height? Taller men are statistically both more likely to survive a war and to produce a male child
I may be coping and sneeding, but being average height has health perks, while being a lanklet only has roastie perks (I'm already married so I don't need to worry about that meta).
Did you even read the study? The methodology is so bad, it’s a mystery how the paper got published.
The author doesn’t account for socioeconomic factors, cause of death or time served, the sample isn’t even representative. High chance of spurious regression, bad paper.
Manlets are braver and make better soldiers than lanklets. Hence why so many didn't return, they were in the thick of it while lanklets hid and mumbled about female concerns. Many such cases
here we have mandatory conscription for men, and when it came time for me, i filled out a formula nad basically got back the answer "errrhh, dont even bother showing up"
im short and my eyes and three different kinds of bad
I did my mandatory service in my country. I did mine in our country's light infantry. We had a massive dude who was 198cm tall (whatever that is in burger units). He couldn't keep up when we did long marches (he would start first in the column but after a few hours would fall behind) and kept getting injured, he also had trouble with getting in and out of our vehicles. In the end, they told him he was too tall, they transferred him to some aircraft refueling job kek.
Yes, anyone who says otherwise is retarded
Not for any reason beyond that manlets can fuck the ground a whole lot better
This counts for a lot, more than any height advantage such as wall hopping might give
I remember autists and wehraboos going buckwild over the ending battle of Fury while also remembering that Audie Murphy basically did the same thing by himself with just a .50 cal mounted on a burning tank destroyer while wounded and getting over malaria
Most of the time. Having a corn-fed, 6'5 250 pound ogre on the squad can be beneficial at times, though. >According to eyewitness reports, Bleak rushed the trench and dove into it, tackling one Chinese soldier and breaking the man's neck with only his hands, killing him. Bleak was then confronted by a second soldier, whom he reportedly grabbed by the neck, fatally crushing his windpipe. A third Chinese soldier then approached, and in the ensuing scuffle, Bleak used his combat knife to kill him... As he attempted to withdraw with the wounded soldier, Bleak was confronted by two more Chinese. Putting down the soldier, Bleak reportedly surprised the Chinese soldiers by charging them and smashing their heads together with such force that he may have fractured the skulls of one or both of the assailants before pushing them out of his way.
>Bleak reportedly surprised the Chinese soldiers by charging them and smashing their heads together with such force that he may have fractured the skulls of one or both of the assailants before pushing them out of his way.
Whatever you need to tell yourself, Anon.
They make for good tankers
Make for pretty much good everything. Being compact is pretty much ideal in most military circumstances. No 6’3” fighter pilots.
>Make for pretty much good everything. Being compact is pretty much ideal in most military circumstances. No 6’3” fighter pilots.
>t. Urgi Ironbeard
Not generals. Nobody respects manlets.
I mean Napoleon
they react faster in close quarters combat due to their shorter limbs & faster nerves
there is no need for a 6" tall soldier anymore, the future soldier is 5'5 because exoskeletons make up for the strength.
The average 100 meter sprint height is 6'3
Usain Bolt was 6'6
Taller men are faster and stronger.
Pound for pound?
Pound your ass with my cock maybe.
Pound my cock with your ass
What you're looking for is a Power Bottom my friend
Not without dinner first
dont fit in vehicles and they fall like a rock parachuting and fries
something i noticed as well. the taller paratroopers seemed to have back/knee problems more often. that being masstac combat jumps havent been used for awhile and i dont seem them being used all that often in the future
which is why i included the the vehicle observation. at some point they will have to cram into a track or truck if regardless if they jump or air assault and they just dont fit
they're also bigger targets
rifles are the great equalizer
thats not the point gay
a manlet can fit into tight spaces, such as airvents and crevices. they are also faster when manuvering URBAN environments, not TRACK FIELDS
exoskeletons can make up for what they lack in muscular strength & increase agility.
the future soldier, literally is a manlet
>urban environments
The same environments that require you to be really good at sprinting from building to building? The last thing you wanna be in an urban environment is slow.
im not a lanklet but i think its harder to fit into a doorway if youre 6'3.
and the point that you just described is THE POINT OF THE EXOSKELETON
>exoskeleton
>literal fantasy tier vaporware
Next we'll be giving manlets Captain America super soldier serum right?
>a manlet can fit into tight spaces, such as airvents and crevices. they are also faster when manuvering URBAN environments
Here's the next 007.
.007
lol you triggered the manlets
>women will always prefer and pursue 6’+
>lanklet genes will always carry on and dominate for that reason alone
There is an absolute correlation between trans and manlets, at a certain point they realize they are more suited to femininity.
Who gives a fuck about what women want when there's 20 guys shooting at you?
It's true that tall guys have a pretty big mobility advantage, especially when there's lots of buildings to use for cover. Mobility will save your life more than anything else.
>Who gives a fuck about what women want when there's 20 guys shooting at you?
Both of which are experiences you’ve never had lol.
>I’ve seen more 6” chuds
Average manlet/latent homosexual post outing himself lol.
you got me 🙁
i want to be pegged by 6" chuds
>Who gives a fuck about what women want when there's 20 guys shooting at you?
im 6'+ and because im not the ideal soldier like you with your sub 6' frame i stay home and fuck your sister and spread my tall genes everywhere while you sit in your trench with 20 guys unloading onto you
And then he woke up
It's 2023 anon, you can't make fun of a guy wanting to be unloaded onto by 20 guys
What’s the point of spreading your tall genes around when 99% of the earth population is going to suffocate in 140 years and your tall ancestors will not be living in space because of the additional calorie and size requirements?
>140 years
bro that is so far away its resonable that my grandchildren wont be alive by then
It is what it is bro. It’s when the thing happens. The 100 years leading up to it aren’t much better.
T. Worked with future humans under groom lake
I wish 20 guys were shooting at my dirty slut face uwu
i have seen more 6" chuds than manlet chuds, but if i see one i will fuck him anyways
manlets are a higher percentage of the population then people over 6' and breed at higher rates
The world population, yes, but why are you comparing yourself to the Chinese, Indians and other 3rd worlders?
I am talking specifically about the white population of America, though admittedly a lot of the studies don't accurately differentiate between Hispanics and whites, which probably skews it a bit
Quality is better than quantity Anon, and most women will have to settle for sub-6’ based off statistics alone.
Tbh I feel bad for them, imagine wanting to get a absolutely mogged by a 6’3”+ giant that can throw you around and bruise your cervix only to end up with some manlet with a lifting obsession. Tragic.
This has nothing to do with the positive qualities of a soldier
Being more attractive than the natives you're occupying is one of the most important qualities a soldier can have.
>being bigger and stronger and more preferable to women has nothing to do with the qualities of a soldier
Ok anom
Stronger to drive what exactly? Soldiers basically all carry the same load within their specific roles. Shorter levers are more mechanically efficient and as someone pointed out earlier less prone to injury from repeated impacts like rucking under heavy load or jumping out of planes. You're not going to be beating your enemies to death.
These manlets... are they in your head right now?
Look at (literally) movie star handsome Audie Murphy up there, wearing every medal for heroism the United States military had. Are you trying to tell me that guy didn't fuck? He spread his 5 foot 5 inch genes across three continents.
Women have daddy issues and female sexual selection is an anomaly. The average is average for a reason.
Tall men won't be able to fit in the exosuits without them being designed too big to fit through a door or maneuver indoors. Size is a hard limiter here and being able to go inside human buildings and use cover is mandatory.
The warrior of the future is a short gamer manlet.
>but noo we cant just make the exosuits 6” taller!
>that would be impossible!
Manlet cope. Bigger soldier, bigger exosuit, better results.
Manlet loses every time.
good luck finding cover and doing exoskeleton manuvers
you forgot physics is a thing and bigger mass = bigger inertia
so ideally, manlets are better because we can do backflips and parkour & shit around lanklet cope
>bigger mass = bigger inertia
This is bad because? You're doubling down on what people were already saying.
Taller soldiers with bigger exosuits will be significantly faster and be able to cover significantly more distance in a shorter amount of time (which is what actually matters on a futuristic battlefield)
Physics.
Imagine scaling skyscrapers as a 6’7 lanklet. The future battlefield is in skyscrapers so hardcore parkour is needed.
And you’re fucking retarded, I haven’t met someone who is 6’5 and could run fast. Usain Bolt isn’t an exception. If you play soccer, or any sport in general manlets are the best because they can run really fast in short bursts. Lanklet cope.
Don’t bother, Anon.
Manlets are insufferably insecure and have to retreat to various sci-fi/fantasy scenarios and imagined technical jargon in order to justify their existence.
See
Absolute cope.
holy cope
being tall and strong doesnt matter if the future battlefield has lasers with pinpoint accuracy, along with infantry mounted radar systems, manlets have a smaller radar cross signature and are more stealthier than lanklets
Here is your battlefield.
It is nothing but sinking mud, jagged rocks, ruined buildings, felled trees and barbed wire as far as the eye can see.
Half the time in battle you are either knee-deep in some soggy farmland, swamp, blown-to-bits forest or rubbled city-scape. You CAN NOT run it! There is no firm surface to place your foot on. You will not be zipping through it like some damn usain bolt.
The rest of the time you will be in some ditch, trench, behind sandbags in a FOB or you are inside some building. And you will always be wearing 40 pounds of weapons and equipment. Either way, you won't be skipping like fucking sonic the hedgehog.
Also there will be some motherfucker with a LMG or a sniper across that field. Being small and nible is the key in today's war.
>watch footage from Ukraine
>it's nothing like this
I don't care how war was waged 100+ years ago when we're talking about today's wars. 99% of what Ukrainian soldiers are doing is just fucking running around.
No, Ukrainians are the ones doing the smart thing: digging in and hosing those muddy fields with LMG's. It's the russians who try to run across the fields, get stuck in mud and get shot to sieves or blown to pieces by mortars/artillery. Although admittedly their own retarded human wave doctrines are to blame for this.
Being a big, tall mofo or running around in the open just makes you an obvious target. Just look at the picture. How the fuck are you going to run across that muddy field if there is a guy with a gun on the other side? You being Usain Bolt doesn't help one.
What footage have you been watching? The front in Ukraine is 20% solid ground, 40% muddy craters, and 40% rubble
We don't fight with clubs anymore
you would make sense in the roman empire
Hm. Hm. That may be true.
However. I have yet to meet man who can outrun boolet.
>The average 100 meter sprint height is 6'3
Run away! Run away!
For most jobs in the military, 170-175 cm are optimal. Being larger usually comes with more drawbacks than benefits. You eat more, take up more space and the strength benefit is marginal. There are exceptions, but they are mostly with artillery crew and crew served organic weapons.
There never was a use for 185 cm soldiers other than parading them in front of some foreign diplomats or loading very big shells into artillery pieces.
>t. 185
unironically where do you live in that 185cm is considered tall
>6"
I think you meant 6' soldier, unless you're thinking of pic related.
>manlets
They screw up range estimation through mil dot reticles. Snipers keep shooting high.
>there is no need for a 6" tall soldier anymore
My 6" soldier is at attention.
I want to oil her up before battle.
unironically harder to shoot manlets than lanklets
also need less supplies and fit more comfortably in more spaces
Yes. You save space and they are easier to carry. It is also a good thing for society to get rid of excess males in war, especially the defective ones.
Do you call a massgrave full of manlets a massgrave or something else?
A gravelet
The Vietnamese are a tiny people and they fight good enough
why would anybody wanna be the tallest guy in a gun fight?
So I can dab on you
this tbh
tall people are bigger targets, id rather be a low profile tom cruise manlet (basically the best SBR of males)
dude COD advanced warfare happened in like 2040 thats like 2 more decades!
and physical strength is gay so height and muscles dont matter to the future manlet soldier
I'd definitely wanna be the fastest and strongest guy.
Yes. I am 5'8 and I could beat the everlocing shit out of anyone 5'6 or less.
I thought colt made men equal. How's a manmore superior to a manlet in a modern war?
>start a thread about general physique
>immediately devolves into homo shit
like clockwork, take your gayry over to PrepHole
Would young Audie be a femboy in 2023?
None of these autists recognize Audie Murphy, let alone even know who he is without a googlin'.
I'll save you the time. He was God's gift to America.
>Women want tall guys, but men don't want tall women.
wtf guys, why would you seek short women? All you guys say how being tall is fucking awesome, but instead of seeking tall women, you go for women who are shorter than sometimes much shorter than you.
Why would you handicap your future kids like that?
If guys pursued tall women especially women taller than themselves, we would have giants walking the earth. Imagine an entire world filled with 9 foot tall Robert Wadlows.
i hate womanlets so much its unreal
i love 6" women as a 5'5 manlet (currently dating one)
You are going to deny an amozonian's child it's birthbite of being able to see above crowds at shows anon, have mercy
Because humans have for a very long time functioned on very limited calories.
Women want tall men because tall men are better at providing food.
Men want short women because they're easier to provide for.
>dies at 22 due to health complications
>requires leg braces throughout his entire life
You know I'm fine being a manlet if gravity is going to fuck my anatomy that hard when I get that tall
If we evolved for that height we'd also evolve much stronger joints and organs. How do you think elephants survive at that size?
Because they're quadrupeds and can spread that weight of a larger body over a greater area both internally and externally. Plus their anatomy is uniquely geared for heat dissipation which is a massive issue when your body gets that big
>plus their anatomy is uniquely geared for heat dissipation which is a massive issue when your body gets that big
I doubt humans, the species with the best thermoregulation on earth will have an issue with this.
Also we've seen massive bipeds in the past, from a physics standpoint we could still get a lot taller than we currently are.
to be fair, Wadlow couldn't feel pain anymore and thus died from a minor leg infection from his braces. If he or somebody noticed the leg infection sooner, he or someone else would be more self-aware of his health/surroundings and Wadlow could've lived a much longer life.
Also, Wadlow kept on growing throughout his entire life. By the time he would've lived to 30, he could've been 12 foot tall.
There would've come a point where his anatomy could no longer sustain that unending growth. Honestly I wish he lived longer to see what the limit of our current anatomy can support and what happens when we go beyond the edge of what our hearts, lungs, and skeletons can support. At what point does it all collapse in on itself
DARPA glows are making Nephilim morons real Kenny. That's what the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan was all about. Retrieving Nimrod's corpse and the Giants of Kandahar's to splice up their genes to bring forth and manifest the real Anti-Christ. Not an act or a ceremonious antichrist like the Pope or Mr. Beast youtube man. The Real McCoy.
YAY
REAL SCHIZOPHRENIA
take your fuckin pills prot
>Women want tall guys, but men don't want tall women.
Buddy, I'd have women locked up in gyms and bred to be tall if given the chance
I'm 5'11", am I a manlet?
In the eyes of women yea
Yes, but you're king of the manlets, at least.
>t. 5'10" prince of manlets
>A thread about height in PrepHole
>was expecting something about how height affects war/combat
>instead it turns into thread about sex and cuck shit
it's like PrepHole is virtually indistinguishable from /PrepHole/
its like you never been in the shit
>Are manlets ideal for war?
Yes.
yes, the pent-up resentment and rage makes them perfect killers and it's not a problem for anyone if they get killed either
why isn't the military doing it's best to recruit 7+ foot tall people? Why do they keep recruiting so many manlets?
Because being tall is a meme on the battlefield, this isn't a basketball game anon. Boldness, good strategy, accurate application of weapons, and strength of will are the factors that make good soldiers.
I read a scifi short story where everyone on earth genetically engineered themselves to be minimum size midgets to save on living space, food, etc. They were hunting down the last remaining giants (normal humans) on the planet trying to exterminate their wasteful kind forever. It was primarily a psychological thing, the tall humans couldn't be allowed to exist without the midgets feeling ridiculous.
What I'm trying to say here is that we need to be careful.
i think we could apply the combined arms team concept for future ground forces,
essentially:
- Main Battle Soldier = 5'8 manlet (not too tall, not too short, just right) for general infantry, and for the main battlefield.
- Light Soldier = 5'5 manlet (trained to do backflips and parkour and can run really fast)
- Heavy Duty Soldier = 6'7 BVLL for lifting heavy weapons and a larger exoskeleton, therefore more room for heavier payload
they will all work in tandem with each other, but Heavy soldiers will be less common, because the Main Battle Soldier fills in general purpose. Light soldier for reconnaissance and tunnel rat duties.
You're not going far enough. Imagine platoons of these fuckers hiding in garbage cans, mailboxes and vietnam-style underground tunnel networks that your soldiers literally can never fit into. Imagine every helicopter dropping off 30 of these dudes rather than 8 normal guys. Imagine every jet and ship and tank needing half as much space allotted for crew. The tactical advantage is overwhelming.
along with exoskeletons, they can literally jump like fleas around the battlefield.
you can airdrop a whole battalion of them from a C130
But imagine how quickly they'd get overpowered by the 12 foot tall super soldiers wearing their spartan armor that can effortlessly defeat the manlet low energy weaponry. Sure, they can hide but they'll get blasted immediately the moment they fire a shot at the enemy.
with an electronic warefare suite, they can swarm the 12 foot lanklet with ease because it disables the mobility of their spartan armor.
the manlets quickly manuver through the lanklet taking out the important components of the spartan armor, effectively disabling the enemy.
5'2" Supermanlet here. Gymnastics is fun and guns are fun. Both parents navy, but I'm just a larper. I like and am dating to a tall woman. I hope my child is either tall with my broad shoulders or short with my shoulders. I fear him coming out a tall lanklet like my cousins and uncles.
tall and strong became obsolete with the invention of guns
You've probably heard of the strange phenomenon that more males are born after wars. But did you know that the most likely explanation for that is height? Taller men are statistically both more likely to survive a war and to produce a male child
Of course, smaller target is always better
I may be coping and sneeding, but being average height has health perks, while being a lanklet only has roastie perks (I'm already married so I don't need to worry about that meta).
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/22/11/3002/652125
>manlets btfo
Did you even read the study? The methodology is so bad, it’s a mystery how the paper got published.
The author doesn’t account for socioeconomic factors, cause of death or time served, the sample isn’t even representative. High chance of spurious regression, bad paper.
Manlets are braver and make better soldiers than lanklets. Hence why so many didn't return, they were in the thick of it while lanklets hid and mumbled about female concerns. Many such cases
yes. its ideal to ship off all the manlets to war to thin out their numbers. only the tall ones back home survive. survival of the fitness
Why tall so mean?
consider the morale impact on the home front if it was nothing but manlets dying out there
all women would be pro-war
here we have mandatory conscription for men, and when it came time for me, i filled out a formula nad basically got back the answer "errrhh, dont even bother showing up"
im short and my eyes and three different kinds of bad
I did my mandatory service in my country. I did mine in our country's light infantry. We had a massive dude who was 198cm tall (whatever that is in burger units). He couldn't keep up when we did long marches (he would start first in the column but after a few hours would fall behind) and kept getting injured, he also had trouble with getting in and out of our vehicles. In the end, they told him he was too tall, they transferred him to some aircraft refueling job kek.
>198cm tall (whatever that is in burger units)
That's as tall as 39.6 Big Macs.
t, American
Lanklet's fertility rate to get larger soldier base > Manlet casualty rate avoidance.
Is this the Duncan from Idaho oblast I've heard talk about?
yes, they're full of rage and their lives don't matter
yes, all manlets should go to the frontlines while us 6ft+ chads stay home and breed Stacy.
>Ctrl+f "Audie Murphy"
>0 results
I'm ashamed of you zoomzooms
"To Hell and Back", the life story of Audie Murphy, starring Audie Murphy as Audie Murphy, based on the book "To Hell and Back" by Audie Murphy.
The first movie filmed entirely in infinite recursion.
you'd think they're much harder to hit
and they are, but they're also smaller compared to the bullet
Dunno about war, but he's ideal for my dick.
>Fifteen minutes into netflix and chill and he gives you this look.
In many roles yes, but 6 footers are still good at carrying more gear, running, climbing, etc.
Yes, anyone who says otherwise is retarded
Not for any reason beyond that manlets can fuck the ground a whole lot better
This counts for a lot, more than any height advantage such as wall hopping might give
>Are manlets ideal for war?
Its never the size of the dog anon, its the fight in him.
I remember autists and wehraboos going buckwild over the ending battle of Fury while also remembering that Audie Murphy basically did the same thing by himself with just a .50 cal mounted on a burning tank destroyer while wounded and getting over malaria
yes
Most of the time. Having a corn-fed, 6'5 250 pound ogre on the squad can be beneficial at times, though.
>According to eyewitness reports, Bleak rushed the trench and dove into it, tackling one Chinese soldier and breaking the man's neck with only his hands, killing him. Bleak was then confronted by a second soldier, whom he reportedly grabbed by the neck, fatally crushing his windpipe. A third Chinese soldier then approached, and in the ensuing scuffle, Bleak used his combat knife to kill him... As he attempted to withdraw with the wounded soldier, Bleak was confronted by two more Chinese. Putting down the soldier, Bleak reportedly surprised the Chinese soldiers by charging them and smashing their heads together with such force that he may have fractured the skulls of one or both of the assailants before pushing them out of his way.
Holy shit it's Doomguy
>Bleak reportedly surprised the Chinese soldiers by charging them and smashing their heads together with such force that he may have fractured the skulls of one or both of the assailants before pushing them out of his way.
lmao
Imagine being a malnourished, 5 foot tall chink and having an enraged burger giant dive into a trench with you.
So we need a goliath corporal for every two dwarf sections, got it
>sections
Dirty commonwealth fingers typed this.
I CRUSHED THE LIL YELLOW MEN, SAH!
Lol he looks like you’d catch him hanging out at a bait shop plotting his next ice fishing trip and buying nightcrawlers
I knew a WWII vet who was 5 foot 5 and whack hundreds of nips with a 50 cal.
you can generally tell how combat effective a man is on the battlefield by how hard they are repressing their homosexual urges.