Another 2 russian ships are out

Remember the pair of landing ships that escaped Berdyansk port few months ago when ukes sunk Saratov (initailly misidentified as Orsk)?
Back then they managed to reach crimea, supposedly
>under their own power
Well, now it turns out that after few months of trying, russians are not able to repair them and have given up trying. "Caesar Kunikov" and "Novocherkassk" are permanently out of the war. and probably will be scrapped.

Of course the official reason is not the damage suffered during ukrainian attack, nosiree. Its because perfidious Poland provided them with fake engine parts in 2019
Damn these perfidious, crafty poles.

https://mash.ru/news/156607

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >They were sent to repair - did not work. It's because of the defective injectors. And now it won’t work to buy new ones - Poland has imposed sanctions.
    >Those perfidious poles! Intentionally giving us defective parts!
    >Help us poles! We need new parts!
    What the frick
    Is this satire??

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Diesel injectors are...at the most...1940's machining and metallurgy tech.

      Are there no lathes in Russia? Is there no metals with which to turn the bodies and valves and make the springs?

      Have rebuilt more diesel injectors for medium and slow speed marine engines than I can fricking count.

      Shit isn't difficult. Nazi Krauts managed to make them for their U-boats while getting their shit pushed in from the sky by the Bongs' and Yanks' bombers.

      Russia can't manage THAT?
      The FRICK we're they THINKING?

      Hell...the Chibks could crank them out 1000 new injectors a day. They might be shot with a very limited lifespan, but you buy them by the pallet.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They can menage that you fricking moron. problem obviously lies somewhere else, you fricking Black person-brained moron.
        Or are you going to blindly trust the Russians?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hey, moron. You can gauge their bullshit by examining in detail how realistic their lies about a thing are.

          Or hadn't that occurred to you?

          Some of us know a little something about ships in general and diesel engines in particular.

          So when Pussolini's flacks claim that it's the injectors, we know enough to call bullshit on that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They might be shot with a very limited lifespan, but you buy them by the pallet.
        >but you buy them by the pallet.
        >the pallet.

        Vatniks have not reached this level of wunderwaffe, anon.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Oh yeah...that's right!
          Clever western neo-Nazi degenerate dope fiends defeat Mother Russia by denying them the decadent pallet and hydraulic pallet jack technologies!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >404 pallet.not found

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    POLAND DAMAGES TWO RUSSIAN LANDING SHIPS BEYOND REPAIR!

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Non ru sources?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      anon if the .ru sources are claiming they're busted, they're busted. Russia is loath to admit any losses, and won't if they don't have to. The idea of claiming something is wrecked when it is not is completely beyond them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        After a while, you start to feel sorry for Wile E Coyote and Elmer Fudd because of their constant pratfalling. Russia is almost at that point, with me
        >almost
        >not quite

        maybe anon was hoping it was another HIMARS strike that finished them off

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Highly unlikely, considering it's the two that were damaged in the strike and we have photographic proof they had fires burning below deck on both of them. Coincidences are one thing, but that's just silly.

          [...]
          honestly I think it was legitimately a Tochkta strike. The units had practiced a shoot-and-scoot exercise targeting Berdyansk before the war, they had tried a day or so previously, and we never got any aerial footage like we would have by now if it was a Bayraktar.

          Why not both?

          Fires gutting part of the ship sounds to me like the kind of thing to drive an already past-lifetime engine over the brink and into eating itself.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No moron-Day then

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Eh, it's very possible that the engines are busted for real. Russia relies a lot on Western tech, and they don't really have the industrial capacity and R&D to produce replacement parts. Expect to see a lot of shit get simplified or disappear from the shelves as sanctions keep choking the Russian economy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Highly unlikely, considering it's the two that were damaged in the strike and we have photographic proof they had fires burning below deck on both of them. Coincidences are one thing, but that's just silly.

      https://i.imgur.com/2HY9nSy.jpg

      >A single TB2 strike destroyed 3 ships
      Apologize

      honestly I think it was legitimately a Tochkta strike. The units had practiced a shoot-and-scoot exercise targeting Berdyansk before the war, they had tried a day or so previously, and we never got any aerial footage like we would have by now if it was a Bayraktar.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I still maintain it was those two guys cruising around in the RIB that the beachside camera caught returning to shore shortly after the explosions

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >honestly I think it was legitimately a Tochkta strike.
        It was, they practicing with their tochkas for just such an event literally just last year and had the launch pre-plotted which made it that much more accurate

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That has less to do with Russian or Western tech and more to do with ships being hard to repair.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't help that the Russians are incompetent.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        LMAO. Fuel injectors for naval diesel engines are literally WWII-era technology. This shit ISN'T hard for anyone with even a remotely functional shipbuilding industry.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, it's quite likely that ships hit by Ukrainian missiles turned out to have faulty engines. As a naval engineer from New York Oblast I can confirm that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I could certainly imagine a ship developing engine problems after being hit by a missile, especially if it started a big internal fire

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Especially if it's parts were already faulty. You have taken a maintenance heavy ship and made it practically un repairable overnight

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >A single TB2 strike destroyed 3 ships
    Apologize

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was a Tochka U, anon.
      >inb4 muh accuracy
      They upgraded the missiles to be more accurate, and it’s a cluster warhead so CEP matters less.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not a TB2 moron. Well out of range, and wouldn't have the payload to scratch a ship as big as that.

      Go suck some hairy, circumcised Turkish wiener elsewhere.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >you live in a timeline where Russia basically admit that Poles sunk their two ships
    Can't make this shit up.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >this is somehow less embarrassing than admitting the Ukrainians shot a ballistic missile at them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Poles sunk their ship
      >without firing a single shot themselves

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >2 ships were disabled by a nation your not even at war with

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This literally doesn't matter, Russia's strength lies in it's Army (ground forces).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It matters for attacking port cities efficiently. You've effectively lost an entire front if you can't land troops on the beaches. Combine that with the Harpoon missiles Ukraine have been getting, more severe losses are gonna happen like this because Harpoon ducks shit up like no tomorrow

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It unironically looks like the Black Sea Fleet will be out of the war permanently apart from some subs and Crimean coast patrols.
        Notice the drastic decrease of navy launched Kalibr's? They probably are close to hitting their war reserve minimums. Most of the fleet is headed to the eastern half of the Black Sea to hide from Harpoons, that means they can't really do anything from that end either.
        The Black Sea Fleet is dead now, at least offensively.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Costal artillery is a b***h as it always has been. Just instead of in Iraq where they had crappy Chinese missiles, they have high grade nato hardware to scare them off. Even though Harpoon is older, it's still better than Russian defensive measures

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lies is the right word

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      no more amphibious landing threat, coastal defence troops can be transferred to the front

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Haha, joke's on you otan troony, amphibious landing threat was long gone already. Puccia wins again!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >This literally doesn't matter, Russia's strength lies

      Fixed that for you, гoмoceкcyaл

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It also lies AT its army.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The STRENGTH to take centimeters of land a week! Hercules weeps tears that he cannot be as Strong

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, it's kinda true since their navy and air force are a joke.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You're losing numerous ships to a nation with no Navy Ivan

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, it lies with them alright.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we don't NEED our navy!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is this picture real?
      Whenever I hear about a Russian navy ship I always imagine them emitting giant plumes of black smoke

      >Claim to be a super power
      >No Navy for Force Projection
      ngmi
      Next you're going to tell me that the UK still has a powerful Navy that's all over the oceans

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I mean the UK does have a powerful navy comparable to most nations, yes. It has bases over the world, yes. It isn't like it used to be, but it isn't some brown water fleet.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well, it's after another LST they were docked next to exploded, so it's not like it's their engines putting off that much smoke.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Completely forgot we built these. While built for the Russian Navy, we were meant to use them for the invasion of Denmark and Sweden which was supposed to be spearheaded by polish naval infantry. Also the shipyard responsible for these is the same that started the Solidarity movement.

        >Is this picture real?
        There's a whole webm floating around.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I've worked ships built in Gdansk.

          They had license-built Sulzer RND slow speed diesels...7 cylinders if I recall.

          I doubt they'd put a slow speed in a landing ship. They probably have medium speeds, MaK or Wartsilas or maybe even Colt-Pielsticks,(keeps your bilges from rusting, they leak so much oil.).

          None of these have hard-to-find injectors.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >There's a whole webm floating around
          unlike the ships

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Is this picture real?
        it's better

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia's strength lies in it's Army (ground forces).
      My condolences.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Having your ground forces be the best part of your armed forces by default (due to literally everything else being terrible) is such clownlike tomfoolery that really can only come from Russia.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't there a satellite image of one of those things spinning around in a circle? Now I wonder if it was intentional or if they actually did get that fricked up on that day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sure was.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        all according to plan, trust the Z

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And you lynch Black folks!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      we whish.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    "Russia is the only country in the world that celebrates independence from Poland
    "

    that make sense now. they are geting ass pain

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Poland used to bully countries around them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        At least they did until I fricked things up.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks, blessed Szlyachta

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    10/10 find anon
    should some one wake up oryx or something?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That missile made one hell of a turn damn. Do we know what this hit, was this the landing ships?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Checked
      I'm still confused how this happens. Is it a HARM picking up its own launcher or a control surface malfunction?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It didn't come back at its launcher, it's just this camera angle that makes it look that way.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          So was it a HARM? Damn man, what ever little Pantisr system was on the other end got fricked

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Dunno but it's happened more than once to der Russoid. The ragheads managed to do it with a Patriot battery once somehow too.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Could be homing in on some tracking radar like counter artillery or a SPAGG near by. Poor friendly shika...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            SAMs need to be configured for urban upturn mode to prevent them from chasing a missile that they didn't get on the first pass all the way to the ground. Most of the time it's not really a big deal to have a SAM come down like that in the field, but if you have air defense of a city as your objective obviously you don't want a SAM coming down into someone's dacha.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Unfortunately this time, regular SAM or HARM, it did come flying back. Hope whoever was on the ground got our alright

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This was filmed like 3 months ago, well before Ukraine got any HARM'S. The HARM'S are also very likely not ground launched, a Pentagon source allegedly confirmed MiG-29's are launching them

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          When did they get HARM anyway?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Few weeks ago now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >https://mash.ru/news/156607
    Has Trojans in it btw. So another source would be nice.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Its because perfidious Poland provided them with fake engine parts in 2019
    I actually hope this is true, because it'd be incredibly funny if the Russians tried to refit after losing that battle and realized they'd been suckered by Poland and have literally no means of doing ANYTHING about it.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hato colony has gone too far. There will be consequences...

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Lost a flagship to a country without a navy
    >Lost two landing ships to a country NOT IN THE WAR

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is what happens when you spend no money modernizing your own shit and investing nothing into building critical components like ENGINES.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's fine.
        Ships are ephemeral.
        Trillions spent on propaganda to subvert the west are what matters.
        When Europe freezes AND starves this winter after a decade of being taught to only ever blame their politicians but never electing better ones, then they will surrender to Russia and counter-attack Ukraine from the rear.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm certainly glad that rocket attack in Tiraspol was so successful in opening up a western front, truly was worth the effort.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Are we back to wild fantasies of Poland invading Lviv again? Those were a fun strain of cope.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Of course the official reason is not the damage suffered during ukrainian attack, nosiree. Its because perfidious Poland provided them with fake engine parts in 2019
    Damn these perfidious, crafty poles.

    Why are r*ssian obsessed with Poles?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you love what you can't touch, poles are the princess in the high tower and amer*ca is the evil dragon keeping ruskis at bay

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The poles need to get their navy in order, get way more subs and throw away that crappy kilo class.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They seem to acknowledge their military sucks with how they are buddying up with South Korea and buying K9/K2/FA-50, I don't think they've bothered with upgrading their navy yet.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >discount d-day is forever canceled

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >permanently out of the war. and probably will be scrapped.
    Damn, the hits keep on coming. Those were some of their newest boats in the Black Sea

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It can't possibly be the injectors for the reasons stated above, but also because if nothing else the Russians could buy them from India. FWIW I toured an INS frigate that was manufactured for the Pajeets by Russia. tbh it wasn't a bad design of ship from what I could tell, and it was kept in pretty good working order. Based on my experience with this stuff I think that the Russians just don't know what right looks like anymore, at least as far as their navy goes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's always been Russia's SOP.
      They come up with good designs, but the execution and materials are shit, and the socket in Western minds where "Preventative Maintenance" plugs into apparently doesnt exist among Vatnik brains.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > Of course the official reason is not the damage suffered during ukrainian attack, nosiree. Its because perfidious Poland provided them with fake engine parts in 2019
    Clean it up Putin, clean it up

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They already knew that port was a ballistic missile target and their mission was stupid. Just unloading BTRs and ammo which could have been driven there by that point.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I get it that reddit took over this board, but when is ukraine going to make any gains?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They already made steady gains for well over two months now, vatBlack person.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    - Copy.jpg
    >Russian ships in their natural habitat (defunct and surrounded by smoke)

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Poland strikes again

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    once again the poles are out for blood

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *