Annexations backfiring

Now that Ukraine has attacked and taken "Sovereign Russian Territory" without anything happening, does that mean that they can take Crimea without any fear of consequences?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What consequences do they have left in the bag that isn't nukes at this point?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      gloves and eyebrows

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        how high has their eybrows raised at this point? are their eyebrows raised all the way up their ass?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Let's just say that the ISS might want to be on the lookout for them

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          They've almost reached the peak of Mt. Glove.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ones that will never be the same!

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        oldfag detected, ya dun goofed

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russian military can always start up extermination campaigns and drag families into the streets to be raped and shot with no survivors.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >start

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Except they can't, Ukraine is a liberation mission, not a conquest.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How is this supposed to help them?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Help them?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Hey, stop with the funny

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          traditional russian morale booster

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Cocksucker beat me to it.

          Help them?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Help?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the ukranians are forced to kill russian cumrades who are sucking eachother off, thus forcing oinkrainians to watch gay porn thus them being gay.

      They already started, seeing has drone operator had to look at two russian men have oral sex before grenaded.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They threaten you by forcing your dick into their ass.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Chemical weapons?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you answered your own question.

      If Putin wants to win do the following:

      1. send a 30 minute warning to Zelensky that complete surrender is required or "atomic consequences" will ensue
      2. Nuke Lviv with the biggest bomb(s) they have. Fallout should not affect Russian troops in the theater.
      3. Give another 12 hours for complete surrender.
      4. Nuke Mykolaiv. Russian forces should have time to avoid radiation exposure.
      5. another 24 hour warning for Kiev to make a decision
      6. Nuke Kiev, Dnipro, Kryvvi Rih.
      7. If there's anyone left to surrender, accept the surrender.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >2. Nuke Lviv with the biggest bomb(s) they have. Fallout should not affect Russian troops in the theater.
        Fallout reaches Poland, Article 5 triggers, steps 3-7 do not occur

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          and the US refuses to respond because nobody in this country high or low wants nuclear war with Russia over Ukraine. NATO would implode if Poland did such a thing.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            the US isn't the only country although the most important. there are also countries like poland which might make an independent decision to strike russia

            is russia then going to nuke them all?

            the US is also expected to be a leader, not responding would damage its position and also encourage china to go for taiwan and threaten nukes

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              when the rubber hits the road the eastern European NATO bloc and Taiwan would be sacrificed, ain't no America going to die for those people NATO is a paper alliance unless Russia simply launches a Ukraine-style attack on a current NATO member. The stakes are clear there.

              Just running basic game theory and Bayesian probability a Russia nuke strike on Ukraine would not be met with any decisive response, and would likely turn the tide of the war decisively and cement Putin as a figure in history as famous/notorious as anyone else, ever.

              He is probably salivating at his options at this point given his and Russia's mentality and sense of place in history. This is a country that fought two huge world wars and led a global millenarian movement (Communism) that most Russians have some fondness for.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Russia would be leveled the moment the missile leaves the launcher. Every vatnik prediction regarding Ukraine and the Western response has been wrong.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                not if Russia nukes Ukraine. Petraeaus and Clark are already out in public saying that the US would attack Russia with conventional forces but not nuclear weapons.

                Once that happens, Russia with either take the licking or will face a tough decision to also nuke the US forces or their bases in Europe.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The US would only use conventional forces because that is all they would need. The country that has the largest amount to lose from using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine is Russia. Putin knows this.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                and then we're back at square one, Russia suffering a humiliating defeat or launching the nukes and ending it once and for all.

                The difference between this crisis and the Cuban Missile Crisis is back then, both sides had an optimistic view that their countries would one day triumph and bring light to the world civilization.

                Putin's Russia is a humiliated cornered animal much more like Hitler or the Japs in WW2. It's a complete different and more dangerous scenario.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's a complete different and more dangerous scenario
                Good.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcbOHRJJFA8&ab_channel=TheAUXOROPodcast

                go to 31 minutes

                watch that my friend. Nukes are fun and all but 4 billion people dying from mass starvation is something I'd rather not take a chance with.

                we saw from Covid people are softened up to the point they won't even take a risk with a virus that kills 1 in 3,000 people it infects, imagine what they will be able to do when they have to actual find their own food

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >but 4 billion people dying from mass starvation is something I'd rather not take a chance with.
                Cool. I would. Learn to be self sufficient, don't live in a city, and you're good to go regardless of what happens. If I happen to be in a nuclear blast, cool. Suddenly it's not my problem anymore.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                They would eat each other. It would happen quicker than you'd expect too. Like within the first month.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia
                >bring light to the world civilization.
                moron what? The only thing russkie bring to civilization is pain and suffering

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                And because China is in fallout range of Russia.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The fact that vatnik bantz has unironically turned to nooks is telling me that this current push is the real deal. The noose is tightening

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Actually, game theory says the only rational response would be total retaliation. Anything short of that risks universal proliferation and the routine use of nuclear weapons. If this occurs, over the long term, the chances of a full-blown nuclear war becomes 100% anyway, where as an immediate strike only *risks* escalating into a full-scale war.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I would agree with you if I believed every person in power were rational people who study game theory. But on the world stage we've seen that almost every single country's leadership will say "Not my problem" and push it off to the generation under them. In 25 years we'll be seeing nuclear detonations over Palestine and people will be crying about what should have been done now to stop it. You'll live to see it. That's a prophecy.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The war will end with 0 nooks (but many ook ooks) and Russia's begrudging humiliation as it is expelled from Ukraine.

                Better than a prophecy, this is Truth.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I hope so. And I believe so as well, but I don't argue against things based on them being retarded anymore. We've been shown for the last 7 months that open retardation doesn't even slow them down. I didn't even think they'd fucking invade and I had tk eat my words.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I didn't even think they'd fucking invade and I had to eat my words.
                kek we have gone from "Russia won't invade" being the topic of debate to "Russia won't collapse as a state within the decade" being it

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's an insane world anon. A year ago if you'd told people all this the dumbest people on the internet would laugh in your face.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                that's because modern people are fucking stupid
                I'm a finn near the border
                always knew what russia was actually like
                almost nobody online ever believed me when I told them russia was never a real state, is already collapsing and will most likely do stupid shit before coming down like the house of cards it is
                it's kind of frustrating to also now see everyone online going on about how they supposedly always knew russia is going to collapse and was never a real country and that this stupid shit was inevitable

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember Crimea. That was just 8 years ago. I had no reason to believe this would be any different. I'm glad it is, just crazy to think about.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >russia was never a real state, is already collapsing
                Like it's more real than Finland which is just western buffer construct and its existence could be brought to an end with one signature and stamp in some shitty Kremlin office.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                If it makes you feel better I thought they would pull off what they did with Crimea and then just sit and hold. Them just doing the 180IQ move of following orders to move in without being told they were going to war and doing a blitzkrieg attack without fuel was so stupid nobody saw that coming.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The war will end
                ~~*They*~~ will never let this war end. Ukraine's job is to collapse Russia not gain peace.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Reminder that despite the fact that da joos apparently want this war to never end Ukrainian officials were complaining that Israeli moderation in peace negotiations back in march involved the a lot of "please just surrender already guys"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The good old Esau Gambit. New to this, I see.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The old "Robby B" Serbian garden gnomeelry double bluff.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No that's the one where they stick cubic zirconia up their arseholes.

                Mate I don't think you're getting into the spirit of the season. That money was just going to pump grease out of some fat moron's heart or a thrice convicted crackhead anyway.

                I'm just saying the scriptwriters have jumped the shark (of Kiev) a bit early and a darker, grittier low budget conflict with a few big set pieces would have gone over better. Think Dredd (2012) vs. Judge Dredd (1995).

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Ukraine's job is to collapse Russia
                >not gain peace.
                ????

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just look at Nordstream problems fucking Germany right up, global economy means mutual dependencies on everyone. including your enemies.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                you have to remember that the people in power who make the official decision may not study game theory
                however the people in charge of actually pressing the button do, and those people have more people under them whose sole job is to study game theory as it applies to nuclear warfare
                and those people will be figuratively, if not literally, screaming at the button pressers to tell the people in power to let them press the button while everyone is still alive

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Just running basic game theory and Bayesian probability a Russia nuke strike on Ukraine would not be met with any decisive response, and would likely turn the tide of the war decisively and cement Putin as a figure in history as famous/notorious as anyone else, ever.
                You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and simply parroting terminology which you think makes you appear knowledgeable. Unsurprisingly, what you're suggesting is, logically, the exact wrong decision. Which of course is why Putin hasn't, and will not, do it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Then you don't understand the consequences of not responding. Or your pretending not to, to get me to waste 30 seconds.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              the consequences of not responding is Russia takes Ukraine and NATO draws a hard line in the sand since now they have almost every other eastern European country in the alliance.

              Russia has shown itself to have a military that is simply incapable of fighting NATO conventionally. They probably couldn't even occupy a totally nuked out Europe at this point. They will take a generation long pause after taking Ukraine and the frontlines will permanently stabilize.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                This, and the US/EU alliance is in shambles anyway now. Even id we DIDNT rek the pipeslines, the mood on the street has taken an anti-American turn that wont go away for probably a generation.

                Remember the old fable about kneecapping your bud so the bear eats him instead?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >This, and the US/EU alliance is in shambles anyway now. Even id we DIDNT rek the pipeslines, the mood on the street has taken an anti-American turn that wont go away for probably a generation.
                Would you like to provide evidence for this absolutely outlandish and retarded claim?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No. Seethe.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                LOL Ivan's source is just his delusional mind. NATO is stronger than ever, US and EU and every other western nation are now closer than ever and with one goal in mind: To send russia back to the stone age, and the chinks will go after that.
                But yeah, they can dream all they want.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                People still care about the EU? Pasific pivot senpai

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Shut up, retard.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How much glowmoron anti-missile measures are there do you think in Ukraine that is kept as secret ?. Not even one of the missile will land in their target after months of nuke threats by the monke.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You forgot 2a.

        2a.) NATO flattens Russia

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          and Russia flattens the US and Europe and we have a nuclear winter that kills off 90 percent of humanity within 3 years. Brilliant.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nuclear winter isn't real and the Russians have dogshit second strike capability because their subs are loud and they don't have that many mobile TELs.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              nuclear winter is extremely real if there's an all-out exchange. 2,000+ nukes would cause a 3-5 year temperature drop of approximately 40F and destroy crop yields across all mid-latitude countries. Likely a 95 percent death rate in US, Europe and Russia, and 50 percent elsewhere.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                go to 31 minutes

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >cause a 3-5 year temperature drop of approximately 40F
                Source: anti-nuclear propaganda which was discredited over 30 years ago.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        and the US refuses to respond because nobody in this country high or low wants nuclear war with Russia over Ukraine. NATO would implode if Poland did such a thing.

        when the rubber hits the road the eastern European NATO bloc and Taiwan would be sacrificed, ain't no America going to die for those people NATO is a paper alliance unless Russia simply launches a Ukraine-style attack on a current NATO member. The stakes are clear there.

        Just running basic game theory and Bayesian probability a Russia nuke strike on Ukraine would not be met with any decisive response, and would likely turn the tide of the war decisively and cement Putin as a figure in history as famous/notorious as anyone else, ever.

        He is probably salivating at his options at this point given his and Russia's mentality and sense of place in history. This is a country that fought two huge world wars and led a global millenarian movement (Communism) that most Russians have some fondness for.

        The old, "We'll win because everyone will let us win for no reason." Sure, this strategy has bitten Russian in the ass about 6 times so far this year, but this time I'm 100% positive it won't result in the atomic glassing of all of their major cities.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        What if they still don't surrender, my Tsar ?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >send a 30 minute warning to Zelensky that complete surrender is required or "atomic consequences" will ensue
        >Zelensky relays the warning to Brandon and Russia is first-striked to oblivion before they can do anything.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      don't they have chemical weapons?

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think once they reach Crimea Russia will finally NOOOK out if only because they've already invested a lot into already, but before then I think Ukraine could take all of Donbas and Russia probably wouldn't do anything.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      goodbye black sea fleet, hello no-fly zone over Crimea

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't even want to imagine what would happen if they are reckless enough to use NOOKS. Global nuclear war is on the table. One thing is for sure, if the news breaks on them using NOOKS I will quickly pack some stuff and leave for the mountains.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They'll never use a strategic nuke.
        Maybe some tactical nukes on military targets, but even that is unlikely. That would push India and China against them. Not to mention US conventional military response wiping out the rest of their heavy weapons near Ukraine, but they dont care about that too much, they know their military is defeated and shitty already.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It is well established that there is no difference. The US says they'll eliminate the black sea fleet and establish a No Fly Zone if tactical nukes are fired simply because it's impolitic to say out loud that the Black Sea Fleet will be destroyed as part of our first strike option, along with every fleet Russia sails, and that the "No-Fly Zone" is going to stretch from Lviv to Vladivostok.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Global nuclear war
        Who want to help Russia in this nuclear war?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I want to help Russia in getting turned into trinitite, if that's what you mean?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Modi and Xi Jinping meeting and then both agreeing to publicly denounce the invasion of Ukraine represnets the most terrifying possiblity to the Russians, which is China and India losing faith in Russia as a partner, and thinking that associating with Russia bring more harm than it does good. Both India and China feel that Russia is a failed state and will now side with the US over Russia, which is more or less the end state for Russia. And I'd bet that US diplomats have worked out a deal with China that in exchange for their intervention in a scenario where Russia uses tac nukes in Ukraine, they would get handed the entirety of eastern Siberia as a tradeoff.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That would be a terrible deal for the US and far too generous to China.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              not entirely. the main Chinese concern is oil cutoff from the Straight of Malacca, and resources from Africa. east siberia would address both of those needs, while wiping away an American rival from the last century.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >download_(9).jpg
            Damn you really don't name any of your files, do you, anon?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            West absolutely wouldn't want an energy independent China. They'd lose too much leverage on them.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Global nuclear war
        Who want to help Russia in this nuclear war?

        Never going to happen and is nothing more than vatnik doomposting/coping to instill 'deep concern' in westerns to slowly eat away at support.

        Russia uses nukes? Russia gets absolutely fucked. End of.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Putin is senile anon, he knows that he’s on the chopping board after the incredibly horrible war. He’s not Biden who is being Weekend at bernies, this guy controls everything in his cunt

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Monke knows that even preparing to use nukes is putting a gun in his mouth.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If they try even just one nuke Russia will get their faces pushed in by everyone faster than you can say "hostis humani generis". Even China would be compelled to abandon Russia, if not turn against them.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          China doesn't even really support Russia. The hopium is that China will give them thousands of tanks, drones and other equipment and China knows if it does it'll be fucked worse than the 'profit' they'll make. Russia doesn't offer anything to them bar cheap gas and oil, which is even cheaper and will get cheaper as this goes on. They have an invested interest for Russia to get fucked. Besides, they have a treaty with Ukraine to defend them if a nuclear weapon is used on them (technically they're suppose to get involved if even a threat is made, but they won't). Not that I expect the backstabbing Chinese to honour it (just like Hong Kong bullshit multiple times in the last 30 years) to honour it if it happens BUT if they don't, goodbye to goodwill and trust from Belt & Road when people see China doesn't honour its treaties.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >quickly pack some stuff and leave for the mountains.
        >mountains
        good luck catching all the nuclear fallout, KEK

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >monke nooks
        >us and china have a backroom deal to split up russia for eachother and avoid a wider conflict
        >xi and brandon command their forces to delete moscow

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I will quickly pack some stuff and leave for the mountains.
        >not sprinting out your door to face the blast head-on and leave your shadow imprinted on the nearest wall
        coward

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You are by law written in the fabled year 1945 to do the quirkiest pose before being vaporized
          You gotta leave a little something for the aliens to laugh at after the end

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're so concerned and worried, am I rite? Fuck you, pidorashka.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I think Russia can weasel their way out of the annexations they made but Crimea would be an unacceptable loss.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Losing Crimea is complete and total humiliation for Russia, they will be the laughing stock of the world for generations to come. Putin will turn to the NOOK, might get a bullet in the head at this point tho

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Putin might just scapegoat Shoigu and retire, go hide in his palace behind a private army of security. His buck-broken replacement will just talk a lot of nationalist shit then slowly rebuild for Russia's next military humiliation.

        Relevant captcha

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No they won't. Losing Crimea doesn't mean certain death for all of the members of the Russian ruling class, nukes do.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're not going to do anything, nukes aren't even on the table. That latest impotent movement of nukes means nothing, they never needed to move shit to strike Ukraine with an ICBM to begin with. Go concern troll your whore of a mother, tell her how useless you are at the troll sweatshop and how you're probably getting drafted soon. She's probably going to be overjoyed at the prospect of getting a Lada.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >russia
      >investing
      Well there was money involved but none on it is in Crimea at this point.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russia isn't sovereign. The Kuril Islands are rightful Ukrainian clay.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The JSDF does a special military action to reclaim sakhalin and the kurils

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think they are planning to nuke their own territory once Ukraine gets further in.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Current cope is that Russia hasn't actually decided which parts of the Oblasts they claimed, will become Russian territory yet.
    Like there will be a Ukrainian Luhansk and a Russian Luhansk etc.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They announced the borders of the annexed territories yesterday, they follow the oblast borders.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous.

    I work in a hospital.
    We had the news on the TV in the waiting room.
    It played the BBC news report on the annexing and said that it changed nothing by all ground reports, and no one gives a shit in Ukraine or the territories.
    Multiple patients in the waiting room kek'd audibly at this.
    Feels good man. Even the normies are laughing at monke.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Lyman locals didn't even know about the news of the Annexation. They were 'officially' part of Russia for a single day and they didn't even know before the Ukrainian soldiers told them.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Moscow Pootinate's actions have made it clear that Russia's borders are not strongly defined and may be changed at any time through one-sided theatrics.
    Its other neighbors should consider this when dealing with their own post-Soviet problems.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia is border-fluid

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Don't use labels like "sovereign" to define us okay we don't like hateful pronouns like "nation-state" used to define us

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Just a loose collection of mafia bosses parading as a state

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >HATO-ful pronouns
          FTFY

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        gulaghomo

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh you cheeky breeki

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia is border-fluid

      Kinda reminds me of a joke, but the intention of that joke was the opposite.
      >With whom does the Soviet Union share a border?
      >With whomever they want!

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. This was the whole point of this latest annexation. I've been telling you that Monke is a CIA agent for ages now.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks there is only one putin

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        A real chad

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Zbros...

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            What? Huh?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nah that was because they couldn't afford to keep paying their soldiers "stationed in foreign country" bonuses

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They did it because they thought Ukies would just pack up and go home, not daring to cross the now Russian border. What a dumb gamble, like all the other gambles lately I suppose.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cut the water supply. Desalination plant technology isn't gatekept, Russia can build one for their land if they want to keep it.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Since Russia won't defend its borders with nukes, China should just take back their old territory.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That is rightfully Best Korean clay

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think china is more interested in Taiwan that the old Russian territories

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Of course, but it's an easy gib to keep the bug population sated while Taiwan is still unattainable. It'd be funny if Russia was willing to handover eastern territory in exchange for military support in the west

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the East of Russia is filled with earth minerals and oil and gas iirc.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Man Vladivostok probably would have flourished under Chinese rule than just be some remote Military Outpost.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that would be based. Finland should take back all of the Gulf of Finland, all of Karelia and the Rybachy Peninsula.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You really have to wonder how quickly Russia would be carved up if everyone who had grievances against it jumped in at the same time. Moscow would be occupied in a week.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >grievances against
          Poland and baltics? They didn't show much while being under Russian occupation for 50 years.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm all for it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Did you have to drain the water during long breaks so that it wouldn't freeze and fuck up the gun?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pee in it? Or maybe some kind of gel/grease substitute for water? Good question, hopefully an autistic Finn/maximboo sees it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          If it's that cold you could just omit the water?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No the barrel would still melt in a few hundred rounds even if it was -30. It'd last longer but you couldn't just ignore the heat.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's snow fed. It just melts the snow and uses the water.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Neat. I like guns.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is probably the simplest and most uncomplicated answer, any resources out there like an actual manual for the thing?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Inner Mongolia will be returned to Mongolia before the end of the century, along with Tibet and Sakhalin.

      https://i.imgur.com/71SC8gA.jpg

      Modi and Xi Jinping meeting and then both agreeing to publicly denounce the invasion of Ukraine represnets the most terrifying possiblity to the Russians, which is China and India losing faith in Russia as a partner, and thinking that associating with Russia bring more harm than it does good. Both India and China feel that Russia is a failed state and will now side with the US over Russia, which is more or less the end state for Russia. And I'd bet that US diplomats have worked out a deal with China that in exchange for their intervention in a scenario where Russia uses tac nukes in Ukraine, they would get handed the entirety of eastern Siberia as a tradeoff.

      >Modi and Xi Jinping meeting and then both agreeing to publicly denounce the invasion of Ukraine represnets the most terrifying possiblity to the Russians
      "There are no upper limits to military cooperation between our countries."

      The Cold War never ended, and the basis for the Sino-Soviet 'split' is as apocryphal as Joseph Smith's golden tablets. The only out is if The Party determines the joint first strike horseshit will be their suicide, and backstabbing the Russians so as to gobble up the Eastern Military District in the ensuing balkanization is an acceptable consolation prize to not getting their coveted Lower 48 lebensraum. All parties in this are evil and retarded beyond belief, so anything is possible.

      India's double dealing will end with zero factories heading their way fleeing China. And that's a good thing. No one believes they don't seriously know about the Good Cop Bad Cop routine played in Pakistan between the Russians and Chinese (and the strictly Anglo redundancy outside the Quad shows that).

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    These retards couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >yfw in the end Russia will haul wheelbarrow full of soil from each of the "annexed" territories and declare annexation succesful

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly wish Russia was more competent. It's like the big bad villain (granted most of this is intentional build up by Western MIC to get maximum money to launder) who at the end of the movie ends up being just a blundering retard,

      The world situation would be way more interesting if the Russians had successfully blitzed Ukraine,

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hope this war ends soon, it's becoming boring and stale, Ukraine also looks ugly and depressing making videos from there uncomfy to watch.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >before_globohomo.jpg

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >boring and stale
      Gb2/pol/. The last few weeks have been kino with highways of death and gopniks snuff porn by the bucketload. We even saw a VDV BTR get destroyed by a HIMAR tailfin. You don't belong here.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I like blue skies, palm trees and warm weather in my war videos.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I like high intensity combined arms manoeuvre, glacis shredded by pyrophoric DU and a night sky with the effervescence of MLRS cluster munition impacts. I am you, but better.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            only kino video out of this whole shitty war is one with thermite falling from the skies.
            >everyone has a GoPro
            actually it doesn't. it's all horrible cheap chink phones footage.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >only kino video
              My dude you're just outing yourself as not one of us. There's a whole bord for people that are sad about this war and its outcomes, but it's not this one. This war produces more kino in a day than Syria did in total and only someone who has no appreciation for war porn or has a direct supply of Kremlin copium could possibly disagree.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >There's a whole bord for people that are sad about this war and its outcomes
                which?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              You sound completely retarded who has no idea what kino is. Termite video was aesthetically pleasing but one of the least kino videos about the war.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        5/10 compared to urban tank battles in syria. reporters where also much better, slavs can't into video production.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nah, you're just a fuckup trying to diminish the conflict. You probably want all mention of it removed from the board.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Now that's boring. No stakes, no dynamism, no scale. Syria was the biggest yawnfest of our generation. Ukraine is the best war we've had in ages and everyone has a GoPro.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Ukraine is the best war we've had in ages and everyone has a GoPro.
            If you pay attention you'll find the only people who wear GoPros are unprofessional foreign legionaries and mercenary troops. In an actual war with fully proffesional militaries, GoPros are a massive intelligence liability and no NCO in their right mind would let you wear one to the frontline.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        > We even saw a VDV BTR get destroyed by a HIMAR tailfin.
        Can someone spoon-feed this one to me

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I didn't save the pic. A Russian source had pictures of a VDV armored vehicle that had the carrier tail section of a HIMAR rocket fall on it, straight through the roof killing one crewman

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day. Autistic gay.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actual mechanized warfare is so boring, god I wish we could go back to threads about what caliber is better or what if bullpup is good.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bullpups are for people that can't manipulate a carbine.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          "manipulating a carbine" is for people who don't reload in cover, i.e. gamers and morons.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course. And those meme elections proven themselves to be such a sham that even the supposingly "legitimate" crimea election is now looked down as clown election as well.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    annexation was only ever about Russia being able to use conscripts.

    Russia law prohibits the use of conscripts "outside of russia" during peacetime.

    Putin doesnt want to declare war, but if he made parts of Ukraine into "Russia" on paper, well, now he can use those ~180k slaves of which russia gets two waves of every year, for a year, in Ukraine.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      A dictatorship isn't bound by laws.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Irrc they can use them anywhere after 4 months of training. "Defending Russia" might be to wave the training requirements.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do people in Crimea actually want to be Ukraine again?

    I am Ukrainian myself, haven't lived in Ukraine for 14 years but I did go to Crimea every summer for vacation. There were always Russian flags there and Russia was always praised(assuming for Russian tourist sake), service staff would look at you funny if you tried speaking Ukrainian.
    As much as I root for Ukraine and want Ukraine to win I don't think Crimea will come easily.
    I even believe over 50% would have voted to join Russia in 2014 if elections were legit. Ukraine was a huge mess back then.
    But maybe after this war Russia will be in such a mess that Crimea will actually want to go back to Ukraine

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      A lot of the hardcore pro-Russians are already leaving, which might make a difference. If Crimea becomes a warzone the demographics will change pretty quick.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >But maybe after this war Russia will be in such a mess that Crimea will actually want to go back to Ukraine
      That's what the opinion was in Ukraine before the war, that eventually Crimea will willingly come back because Russia is so shit
      Now with the moogilizatsion it's for sure

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tatars probably do, and nobody cares what r*ssians want.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        tatars probably just straight up want the khanate back

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russians always had the naval base there which was economically important to the region and encouraged people to maintain the links to Russia rather than becoming wholly Ukrainian
      Same was true of a lot of port cities in Ukraine because they primarily did business with Russia while Ukraine was a dirt-poor shithole that gave them little economic opportunity

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Who says they get a say? Since when was that a thing? The borders are defined under international law. If they love Russia so much they can fuck off back there and the Tatars can move back to their homes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      they can go through the legal route and get recognition like other separatist states

      if you want to get recognised as a separate country or nation to ukraine, don't have a foreign country intervene and invade

      the scottish SNP party have been campaigning for years with no success so far, yet haven't invited in a foreign nation to liberate them from the UK

      since 2014 it has destroyed any chance of crimea ever being legally recognised as part of russia by other countries because of this

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      All of the retired Russian officers in Crimes might be dead soon after mobilization.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    what are they gonna do? shoot them?

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's just an excuse so Putin can circumvent Russian law and fully mobilize if he feels the need to. Apparently there's some law about not using conscripts to invade a foreign country, but if he can claim that Russian territory is being attacked, then that no longer applies.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Be careful dude, i have the nuke remote in my hand!

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being special forces guy. Imagine having BLACK OPS COVERT STEALTH once in a lifetime mission to disarm Russias nuclear arsenal?
    Damn dude.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why stop at Crimea?
    KUBAN IS UKRAINE

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes
    monke really shot himself in the foot with this one

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they've been bombing "sovereign" "russian" territory for months now

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Now that Ukraine has attacked and taken "Sovereign Russian Territory" without anything happening, does that mean that they can take Crimea without any fear of consequences?
    They were going to anyway. That cunt putin only annexed them and made them 'legally russia' so he can order conscripted kids there which he could not in a 'foreign special military operation'.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Without fear? I wouldnt say so

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    arma 3 antistasi but it's Ukraine in Feburary

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course, this means that we will enter the Crimea. It is extremely important that the support of the West continues, the Russians are already pouring in, in many areas they are panchiesque running, leaving equipment and holes in the defense.

    They are scared, and we are angry for Bucha and other outrages in our cities.

    Those new soldiers they are mobilizing are a pitiful sight. Drunk, stupid and completely untrained. Ukrainian fighters, along with NATO weapons, are grinding them to dust at a tremendous speed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They are scared, and we are angry for Bucha and other outrages in our cities.
      Bucha wasn't real. Don't you read dvach?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        On dvach is a brutalized crowd that refuses to accept reality. It hurts them to believe that their "strongest army in the world" turned out to be a bunch of bastards who do not know how to fight and are busy stealing washing machines. Years of propaganda have brainwashed them so much that they have reflexes to Ukrainians like Pavlov's dog to a light bulb.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Russia has no room left to escalate

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have been totally opposed to any American involvement in this shit show of a war from the start and I think that people with Ukraine flag emojis in their Twitter profiles deserve to be gassed, but I am 99%+ certain that Russia will not use nukes.

    If anything they could use VX first. They won't do that either though.

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They could always take Crimea without any fear of consequences, they stated that as a goal from very early in the campaign. At this point they could take Belgorod and the Russians wouldn't do shit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Пидopaшкa, ycпoкoйcя

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Misfire, you stupid gay.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    All the nice explosion footage isn't worth the crapflood of retarded subhuman golem or the financial costs involved.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Man but did you see that fucking road ambush though? It was so cooooool.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It would be cheaper to blow up Ukrainians ourselves.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Im pretty sure the over seas / hazard pay alone would cost more than we've sent actually. Moving The Machine in its entirety is really expensive.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Who said anything about boots on the ground or trying to win? Pretty sure we could get better footage of unsavory slav rapists being vaporised out of ~$10B in ordnance with no outsourcing.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's just not the same without the people. CGI vs hand crafted miniature sets. You just can't say no the that personal touch.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                So send in a few mercenaries, it's not like half the footage doesn't have fucking American accents in it already.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Mate I don't think you're getting into the spirit of the season. That money was just going to pump grease out of some fat moron's heart or a thrice convicted crackhead anyway.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want Ukraine to take all of Russia’s lands on the Black Sea

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You mean lands at the black sea under temporary Russian occupation.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *