And This is a Good Thing

fuck the military-industrial complex. look at this greedy pig trying to work his pay check from the military industrial complex, i bet he sucks off lockheed's ceo daily

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    he's lying you know
    he just wants more gibs for dem military industrial complex

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all of the top pigs lie, i hate how blatantly they lie and get away with it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/gIQsQRi.jpg

        fuck the military-industrial complex. look at this greedy pig trying to work his pay check from the military industrial complex, i bet he sucks off lockheed's ceo daily

        he's lying you know
        he just wants more gibs for dem military industrial complex

        >all of the top pigs lie, i hate how blatantly they lie and get away with it.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          kys . you're just a dumb boot licker.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kys because you let bootlickers like him get away with it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this board really is like 70% gay retards that work for some govt agency innit

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Eisenhower warned us how long ago and in how plain terms that the MIC was a cancer on the country?
    Dunno what you'd even do about it now. There's so much money in politics it's just unreal.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Eisenhower warned us how long ago and in how plain terms that the MIC was a cancer on the country
      No he didn't.
      >Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense.
      >Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.[1]
      Literally "we need this, but keep it in check" platitudes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Eisenhower warned us how long ago and in how plain terms that the MIC was a cancer on the country
      No he didn't.
      >Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense.
      >Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.[1]
      Literally "we need this, but keep it in check" platitudes

      The entirety of Eisenhower's farewell address is eerily prescient. And the next quote everyone leaves out.
      >in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
        But literally opposite happen.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We can't arm America, which is too chickenshit to fight Russia directly, and the country that's actually fighting them at the same time!

    I don't get this argument. We're clearly not going to fight Russia anytime soon and this shitshow has probably put China off of Taiwan for at least ten years. There's nothing to worry about if we're understocked for a couple years.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > and this shitshow has probably put China off of Taiwan for at least ten years
      And what if it hasnt?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Then we are fucked. And even if it has, we are still fucked. The longer we wait the stronger China gets. We need them to fuck up sooner rather than later.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          China is about to face a huge population crisis. They've got a few decades at most before they've got more old people to support than young people supporting them. That's not a problem they can fix by stealing tech and ripping off westerners like they usually do.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >China is about to face a huge population crisis. They've got a few decades at most before they've got more old people to support than young people supporting them. That's not a problem they can fix by stealing tech and ripping off westerners like they usually do.

            <how China solves this

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine the shitshow of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, now with the catch that there is a sea in the middle. How well did the Odessa landings go?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He already walked it all back.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >name literally tranlates to Carlos of the bull

    Yep, I thought something smelt bad

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is he the bull you let fuck your wife?

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >is on PrepHole
    >hates MIC
    what?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Board has been flooded by shills from all sides for the past few days.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fat overweight over aged fuck way overdue to be put out to pasture

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Please, gib money!

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like how it's the navy that saying this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There’s a lot of commonality between missile components. Didn’t read what he said to be honest, but from a Navy perspective, the argument could be made that an MIC focused on replenishing land based missile stock for Ukraine diverts needed components to maintain naval missile stock. That’s assuming that industry is in fact not capable of producing stock for the US and Ukraine like he suggests.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lol no there isn’t. Nothing in the HIMARS gmlrs goes into any of the sea based systems

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Navy has their own army

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, he's absolutely right.
    And it's just a small part of a world-wide problem with industries right now - where some of the suits at the top would take deliberately counterproductive decisions for the sake of short-term gains. Not meeting demand, not putting any funds into innovation, pumping prices or cutting spending until all clients move away and the company suddenly fails "for not reason", investing company funds into black holes (e.g. Chinese companies investing in Chinese real estate).

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we're definitely failing
    >WE NEED MORE MONEY
    Only non-Americans believe these sorts of articles which makes it so much funnier

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Let's pump the defense budget to $1 trillion and make it so the airforce is bound by law to bomb Serbia with each year's surplus

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am a moderate and I think this is an excellent idea.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Carlos Del Toro

    US high command should be Anglo-Celts and high achieving blacks until 2050 at least

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >blames MIC
    >sucks off lockheed's ceo
    Wat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he doesn't blame the MIC, he blames society and short-sighted politicians

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we need more production
    >HURR DURR MIC MIC DURR
    why does this thread smell like vatnik glowie?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *