All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior?

All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Get called out for shilling
    >Right back to old faithful
    You're a homosexual OP. Shill on another basket weaving forum.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Very telling that you didn’t answer the question

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/TdPY0mu.jpg

        All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior?

        Hey Warriortard why aren't you in Bakhmut at the moment?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Never heard of it. It’s interesting to note that you were unable to provide an answer for the question posed in the OP

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Ah, so you are a draft dodging coward. Thanks for confirming that. How many Russian dicks did you have to suck to pull that off? Or did you just suck them because you like it?

      • 1 year ago
        Sageru

        >aha but you haven't given me the response I am baiting for so I win
        If I had three wishes I'd have you drawn and quartered, brought back to life, then burned at the stake

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That would require you to admit to yourself what’s plain for all to see

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Hey Warriortard why aren't you in Bakhmut at the moment?

      >aha but you haven't given me the response I am baiting for so I win
      If I had three wishes I'd have you drawn and quartered, brought back to life, then burned at the stake

      Ah, so you are a draft dodging coward. Thanks for confirming that. How many Russian dicks did you have to suck to pull that off? Or did you just suck them because you like it?

      Warriortard threads suck.

      Is it true that Warriortard's wiener is so small that he doesn't know if it can get hard or not?

      kek there are only 6 unique posters itt. Bongs utterly wrecked from warrior posting

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        kek that’s 6 posters including the OP. Verifiable British samehomosexualry. You just love to see bongs so blasted

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        kek that’s 6 posters including the OP. Verifiable British samehomosexualry. You just love to see bongs so blasted

        >implying you arent samegayging like in every darn thread
        actual kek

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon there are 6 posters including OP and I linked 6 posts critical of the OP. There’s one or two absolutely mindfricked bong posters itt

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Are you fricking braindead?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Riveting reply anon. You sure threw attention away from the fact that bong poster got caught samegayging too early in the thread

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Just for the record, warriortard: Samegayging is a pathetic thing to do?

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior?
    Yes

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard threads suck.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is it true that Warrior has to be reloaded by hand?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is it true that Warriortard's wiener is so small that he doesn't know if it can get hard or not?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it’s manually loaded. If you want to switch ammo types you have to either shoot the remaining ammo in the ready area or manually unload the clips and replace with the desired ammo type. Huge flaw

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes, it's muzzle loaded

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Deflection cope

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, the warrior is a superlative fighting machine without equal.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Obviously
    >t. Bong

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Based america making better armored vehicles than the British.

    American defense procurement flex thread

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We'll see

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yea the warrior will definitely have a chance to prove itself by never seeing combat again. Meanwhile, the big boy IFVs are gearing up for a major offensive

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >pp status
      >HARD

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >blast russian into ground beef
      >get out on top of bradley
      >the last memory imprinted in the vatnik brain is you doing the fortnite default dance

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      for fricks sake, get rid of those moronic tan bits already. it's triggering my ocd every time i see it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      God speed lads

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is it true that warrior's autocanon is not stabilized?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes that’s one of the main reasons for its bad reputation

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >not stabilized
        >yes
        what the frick I always took these threads as a joke, but I went on the wikipedia and it seems warrior production began in 19.. 86
        like 6 years behind bmp2

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That’s where the scandal lies. The fact that the superior Bradley was in production before the national embarrassment that is the warrior will never not be funny

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The constant back and forth is annoying but yes the Bradley is the better fighting vehicle. The warrior would make a great APC but unfortunately it’s forced into the role of IFV because that’s what the British adopted it for.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Noguns here, isn't the Warrior the one that has 3 round ammo clips? That sounds like it would be fricking awful, what were they thinking?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It is. And yea it’s a huge flaw

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What's the warriortard cope for this? I feel like any layperson would look at this and go what the frick

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          His only cope is to not discuss it at all and instead screech that it’s not fair to discuss the warrior on /k/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >This entire thread of samegayging
      Most notable is this samegayging

      It is. And yea it’s a huge flaw

      What's the warriortard cope for this? I feel like any layperson would look at this and go what the frick

      His only cope is to not discuss it at all and instead screech that it’s not fair to discuss the warrior on /k/

      Where he pretends warriortard is someone that defends the warrior, not his moronic ass that posts a warrior thread to hate on it every day and pretends it's bongs samegayging not him.
      I honest think half the thread is him, it's disgusting how obsessed he is.

      Yep, it's a warrirotard thread alright.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You seem very convinced of this despite being wrong.
        >inb4 I’m not warriortard you are!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I know you use your phone and pc moron. Nice try though.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            and how do you know that? Could the answer be you don’t and are stating things as fact that aren’t to soften the blow to your ego

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Its almost like this isn't warriortard thread 23534674752

              Now take your bump and frick off the board already. Better yet have a nice day.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >no fun allowed the anon
                oh piss off already this is not your personal blog
                but seriously the bong would have been better of buying american

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Not your personal blog
                >Posts a warriortard thread almost every single day without fail for over a year and a half
                >Often branches out to around 4-6 threads a day seething about bongs, Germans or koreans
                >Effectively writes a blog worth of posts for each thread alone, every day.
                Where did the bongs rape you, anon?

              • 1 year ago
                sage

                >almost every single day without fail for over a year and a half
                wow warriortard is that broken?
                the superiority of the Warrior really rustles his jimmies

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When are you going to have a nice day?

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes the Bradley is much better but you knew that didn’t you

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Warrior is really bad

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, it is.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    FV520 class Warriors from WCSP are very good. Only issue is they're not making any of them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What makes them not bad like the rest

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        A new turret featuring an xboxhueg 40mm autocannon and a shitload of new sensors, but it was too sensible for the Bong government so they cancelled it during the annual Defense Review two years ago.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          40mm isn’t really a good IFV caliber either, but if it had stabilization than that would have been a big upgrade

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Even the 30mm doesn't have stabilization kek
            >Following the cancellation of the CSP Leicestershire-based Digital Concepts Engineering has proposed a system to stabilise the Warrior’s 30mm Rarden cannon, allowing the vehicle to fire on the move
            the absolute state of bongs

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Firing in the move is really important for a frontline vehicle like an IFV too

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The 30mm is what it always had since the 80's moron but you knew that.

              I support a rangeban of the entire United Kingdom as well

              Yeah yeah have a nice day homosexual, delete this thread too.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm well aware. I was not aware that it wasn't even stabilized.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah yeah yeah have a nice day, heard it all before.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Are you defending the design decision to go with a non stabilized cannon? It puts the warrior at a marked disadvantage

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    kek subtle

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    better at not being as good sure

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      my fricking sides! the perfect argument!

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    kek this bing is broken. The warrior is regarded as complete dogshit for all the baked in flaws

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Bradley
    Can shoot on the move
    Dual feed mechanism
    Carries a lot more ammo
    Integrated TOWs
    Better optics for gunner and commander
    Worse armor
    >warrior
    Unstabilized gun
    No dual feed mechanism
    Fires from clips
    Small amount of ready rounds
    No integrated TOW
    Better armor

    Yea the Bradley is definitely a better IFV for the armament it brings to the table. It is a fighting vehicle afterall

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It speaks volumes that the ukranians didn’t ask for the warrior

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >sa-80
    >the warrior IFV
    >putting a rifled barrel on a MBT
    >needing 3 piece ammo for your MBT
    The lack of export sales is completely understandable

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    kek subtle

    [...]
    better at not being as good sure

    [...]

    [...]
    kek this bing is broken. The warrior is regarded as complete dogshit for all the baked in flaws

    same poster

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Of course it is. All bong and antibong posts in your thread are you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      im just a thread tourist (though bradley is bae), but youre a homosexual

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    well it depends,
    does it have a ready to fire mounted ATGM?

    [...]

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    please warriortard, stop schizoposting, its not good for your health

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    kek warriortards Bradley hate thread got pruned.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nah he just deleted it because his narrative wasn't working kek

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    An infantry man would rather be sat in the back of a Warrior that is for sure.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Probably true for COIN operations where mines are the only real threat. During a conventional war the Bradley is able to defend itself much better

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. The warrior is more of an APC with the addition of a recon vehicles gun. I would not want to come across armor in a Warrior

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >70 replies
    >23 posters
    Fricking remove yourselves you samegayging autistic morons.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I support a rangeban of the entire United Kingdom as well

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WHY are these threads still made? Why are we branching into Bradley? Is it because your troll threads keep getting deleted?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People like talking about the warrior. It helps that it’s verifiably bad and a case can’t be made that it’s good

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >a case can’t be made that it’s good
        The only bad thing about it is the cannon. Obviously that is a big flaw but it's more mobile than the Bradley and better armoured. It survived multiple all-side RPG ambushes in Iraq with no crew losses. In the Gulf a Warrior was hit with a 120mm HESH round in a friendly fire incident and nobody inside died (although they were pretty badly messed up).
        For a vehicle of its time its survivability and mobility were exceptional. It's just obsolete and should have been replaced 20 years ago.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >The only bad thing about it is the cannon
          That’s not the only bad thing and it’s still a massive flaw. It’s not like the only thing wrong with the cannon is the lack of stabilization. It still fires from 3 round clips, it still has no dual feed capability. Another flaw is the lack of integrated ATGMs. Here’s what an ATGM capable warrior looks like. Yea, it’s shorter ranged, No the gunner can’t fire it using his controls, yes Simone has to be completely exposed while firing the single round at the ready

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That really speaks to why the challenger and HESH never took off. The fact that it’s marketed as an anti infantry and armor vehicle round but it can’t cause spalling on a warrior is really bad.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >He takes something positive and turns it around as a negative
            Yeah. A shill for sure.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It’s not a positive that your 120mm tank round that no one else uses fails to kill people inside an IFV. HE from an abrams would decimate a warrior. Apparently everyone was right about the squash head meme

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >The fact that it’s marketed as an anti infantry and armor vehicle round
            It isn't, it's 'marketed' as an anti structure round.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >warrior was hit with a 120mm HESH round in a friendly fire incident and nobody inside died
          jeez imaging bragging about your unicorn shell being a wunderwaffe worth keeping rifled barrels in the XXI fricking century ... and it can't even reliably kill crew of an IFV
          lmao

          i swear to god every excuse bongs make up is just a joke that writes itself
          You should have just bought abrmas

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >In the Gulf a Warrior was hit with a 120mm HESH round in a friendly fire incident and nobody inside died
          Is it possible to provide a link to prove this?
          I was thinking about making a thread discussing latest MBTs tank v tank capabilities and I would like to use this case as an illustration of HESH shortcomings

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Make the thread and I’ll be in there. I have a lot to say about the challengers 3 piece ammo

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is all coming off as earnest questioning and the British come out with egg on their face

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Iphone posting
      Hi warriortard's phone talking to his computer

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *