All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior? Posted on March 7, 2023 by PrepHole Contributor All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior?
>Get called out for shilling
>Right back to old faithful
You're a gay OP. Shill on another basket weaving forum.
Very telling that you didn’t answer the question
Hey Warriortard why aren't you in Bakhmut at the moment?
Never heard of it. It’s interesting to note that you were unable to provide an answer for the question posed in the OP
Ah, so you are a draft dodging coward. Thanks for confirming that. How many Russian dicks did you have to suck to pull that off? Or did you just suck them because you like it?
>aha but you haven't given me the response I am baiting for so I win
If I had three wishes I'd have you drawn and quartered, brought back to life, then burned at the stake
That would require you to admit to yourself what’s plain for all to see
kek there are only 6 unique posters itt. Bongs utterly wrecked from warrior posting
kek that’s 6 posters including the OP. Verifiable British samegayry. You just love to see bongs so blasted
>implying you arent samefagging like in every darn thread
Anon there are 6 posters including OP and I linked 6 posts critical of the OP. There’s one or two absolutely mindfucked bong posters itt
Are you fucking braindead?
Riveting reply anon. You sure threw attention away from the fact that bong poster got caught samefagging too early in the thread
Just for the record, warriortard: Samefagging is a pathetic thing to do?
>All memes aside, is the Bradley fighting vehicle better than the warrior?
Warriortard threads suck.
Is it true that Warrior has to be reloaded by hand?
Is it true that Warriortard's cock is so small that he doesn't know if it can get hard or not?
Yes it’s manually loaded. If you want to switch ammo types you have to either shoot the remaining ammo in the ready area or manually unload the clips and replace with the desired ammo type. Huge flaw
yes, it's muzzle loaded
No, the warrior is a superlative fighting machine without equal.
Based america making better armored vehicles than the British.
American defense procurement flex thread
Yea the warrior will definitely have a chance to prove itself by never seeing combat again. Meanwhile, the big boy IFVs are gearing up for a major offensive
>blast russian into ground beef
>get out on top of bradley
>the last memory imprinted in the vatnik brain is you doing the fortnite default dance
for fucks sake, get rid of those retarded tan bits already. it's triggering my ocd every time i see it.
God speed lads
Is it true that warrior's autocanon is not stabilized?
Yes that’s one of the main reasons for its bad reputation
what the fuck I always took these threads as a joke, but I went on the wikipedia and it seems warrior production began in 19.. 86
like 6 years behind bmp2
That’s where the scandal lies. The fact that the superior Bradley was in production before the national embarrassment that is the warrior will never not be funny
The constant back and forth is annoying but yes the Bradley is the better fighting vehicle. The warrior would make a great APC but unfortunately it’s forced into the role of IFV because that’s what the British adopted it for.
Noguns here, isn't the Warrior the one that has 3 round ammo clips? That sounds like it would be fucking awful, what were they thinking?
It is. And yea it’s a huge flaw
What's the warriortard cope for this? I feel like any layperson would look at this and go what the fuck
His only cope is to not discuss it at all and instead screech that it’s not fair to discuss the warrior on PrepHole
>This entire thread of samefagging
Most notable is this samefagging
Where he pretends warriortard is someone that defends the warrior, not his retarded ass that posts a warrior thread to hate on it every day and pretends it's bongs samefagging not him.
I honest think half the thread is him, it's disgusting how obsessed he is.
Yep, it's a warrirotard thread alright.
You seem very convinced of this despite being wrong.
>inb4 I’m not warriortard you are!
I know you use your phone and pc retard. Nice try though.
and how do you know that? Could the answer be you don’t and are stating things as fact that aren’t to soften the blow to your ego
Its almost like this isn't warriortard thread 23534674752
Now take your bump and fuck off the board already. Better yet have a nice day.
>no fun allowed the anon
oh piss off already this is not your personal blog
but seriously the bong would have been better of buying american
>Not your personal blog
>Posts a warriortard thread almost every single day without fail for over a year and a half
>Often branches out to around 4-6 threads a day seething about bongs, Germans or koreans
>Effectively writes a blog worth of posts for each thread alone, every day.
Where did the bongs rape you, anon?
>almost every single day without fail for over a year and a half
wow warriortard is that broken?
the superiority of the Warrior really rustles his jimmies
When are you going to have a nice day?
Yes the Bradley is much better but you knew that didn’t you
Warrior is really bad
Yeah, it is.
FV520 class Warriors from WCSP are very good. Only issue is they're not making any of them.
What makes them not bad like the rest
A new turret featuring an xboxhueg 40mm autocannon and a shitload of new sensors, but it was too sensible for the Bong government so they cancelled it during the annual Defense Review two years ago.
40mm isn’t really a good IFV caliber either, but if it had stabilization than that would have been a big upgrade
Even the 30mm doesn't have stabilization kek
>Following the cancellation of the CSP Leicestershire-based Digital Concepts Engineering has proposed a system to stabilise the Warrior’s 30mm Rarden cannon, allowing the vehicle to fire on the move
the absolute state of bongs
Firing in the move is really important for a frontline vehicle like an IFV too
The 30mm is what it always had since the 80's retard but you knew that.
Yeah yeah have a nice day gay, delete this thread too.
I'm well aware. I was not aware that it wasn't even stabilized.
Yeah yeah yeah have a nice day, heard it all before.
Are you defending the design decision to go with a non stabilized cannon? It puts the warrior at a marked disadvantage
better at not being as good sure
my fucking sides! the perfect argument!
kek this bing is broken. The warrior is regarded as complete dogshit for all the baked in flaws
Can shoot on the move
Dual feed mechanism
Carries a lot more ammo
Better optics for gunner and commander
No dual feed mechanism
Fires from clips
Small amount of ready rounds
No integrated TOW
Yea the Bradley is definitely a better IFV for the armament it brings to the table. It is a fighting vehicle afterall
It speaks volumes that the ukranians didn’t ask for the warrior
>the warrior IFV
>putting a rifled barrel on a MBT
>needing 3 piece ammo for your MBT
The lack of export sales is completely understandable
Of course it is. All bong and antibong posts in your thread are you.
im just a thread tourist (though bradley is bae), but youre a gay
well it depends,
does it have a ready to fire mounted ATGM?
please warriortard, stop schizoposting, its not good for your health
kek warriortards Bradley hate thread got pruned.
Nah he just deleted it because his narrative wasn't working kek
An infantry man would rather be sat in the back of a Warrior that is for sure.
Probably true for COIN operations where mines are the only real threat. During a conventional war the Bradley is able to defend itself much better
This. The warrior is more of an APC with the addition of a recon vehicles gun. I would not want to come across armor in a Warrior
Fucking remove yourselves you samefagging autistic retards.
I support a rangeban of the entire United Kingdom as well
WHY are these threads still made? Why are we branching into Bradley? Is it because your troll threads keep getting deleted?
People like talking about the warrior. It helps that it’s verifiably bad and a case can’t be made that it’s good
>a case can’t be made that it’s good
The only bad thing about it is the cannon. Obviously that is a big flaw but it's more mobile than the Bradley and better armoured. It survived multiple all-side RPG ambushes in Iraq with no crew losses. In the Gulf a Warrior was hit with a 120mm HESH round in a friendly fire incident and nobody inside died (although they were pretty badly messed up).
For a vehicle of its time its survivability and mobility were exceptional. It's just obsolete and should have been replaced 20 years ago.
>The only bad thing about it is the cannon
That’s not the only bad thing and it’s still a massive flaw. It’s not like the only thing wrong with the cannon is the lack of stabilization. It still fires from 3 round clips, it still has no dual feed capability. Another flaw is the lack of integrated ATGMs. Here’s what an ATGM capable warrior looks like. Yea, it’s shorter ranged, No the gunner can’t fire it using his controls, yes Simone has to be completely exposed while firing the single round at the ready
That really speaks to why the challenger and HESH never took off. The fact that it’s marketed as an anti infantry and armor vehicle round but it can’t cause spalling on a warrior is really bad.
>He takes something positive and turns it around as a negative
Yeah. A shill for sure.
It’s not a positive that your 120mm tank round that no one else uses fails to kill people inside an IFV. HE from an abrams would decimate a warrior. Apparently everyone was right about the squash head meme
>The fact that it’s marketed as an anti infantry and armor vehicle round
It isn't, it's 'marketed' as an anti structure round.
>warrior was hit with a 120mm HESH round in a friendly fire incident and nobody inside died
jeez imaging bragging about your unicorn shell being a wunderwaffe worth keeping rifled barrels in the XXI fucking century ... and it can't even reliably kill crew of an IFV
i swear to god every excuse bongs make up is just a joke that writes itself
You should have just bought abrmas
>In the Gulf a Warrior was hit with a 120mm HESH round in a friendly fire incident and nobody inside died
Is it possible to provide a link to prove this?
I was thinking about making a thread discussing latest MBTs tank v tank capabilities and I would like to use this case as an illustration of HESH shortcomings
Make the thread and I’ll be in there. I have a lot to say about the challengers 3 piece ammo
This is all coming off as earnest questioning and the British come out with egg on their face
Hi warriortard's phone talking to his computer