>shot down by AnsarAllah, technical failure, etc >technical failure, etc
kek
>majority are drones
topkek
>losses happened over 8 years
megatopkek
This is like serbians acting all high and mighty because they downed a single f-117 after NATO abused all of their holes and then even tore them a new butthole and abused that one too. Keep seething about American superiority.
Also looking into that it seems 1/3rd of those losses are one type of drone (51 Orans) and and other 1/3rd are drones as well
Whereas Ukraine has lost most of it's air force (if 190 aircraft is to be believed on Wikipedia)
Russia lost a shitloaf of its aircraft that it can use outside of the country. If they use any more, they may have to pull aircrafts from Syria(already happened since one of the guys that did bombings in Syria died in Ukraine) or do limited sorties from within their controlled territory or outside of Ukraine itself.
I mean
I wouldn't say it's too much considering they still have a shit ton leftover
And have just moved to using drones and missiles since it's cheaper and easier to use
Also why are we discussing Russian losses on an American losses thread
1 year ago
Anonymous
How many of those aircrafts are in operational conditions? How many of those aircrafts are actually there instead of being on paper? And how many pilots do they have available to take the spot? How many of those aircrafts are actually modernized?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Idk man I'm just some dude
How's your day been
1 year ago
Anonymous
Well, those are important when it comes to being able to utilize them in effective means. I am doing fine.
1 year ago
Anonymous
That's good
I'm just watching red letter media with my wife
1 year ago
Anonymous
>considering they still have a shit ton leftover
Proof? Can I see what condition they're in? Or am I supposed to believe vatnigs, who are proven liars?
What makes people Ree about arabs being shit at war? Iraq is a good example that even if you have american tech, it won't stop them from being moronic.
>8 years of war >11 planes killed >16 helicopters killed >rest is all drones >only manned american losses are two helicopters
is this supposed to be impressive?
id say serbias 1 f117 kill is more impressive
>thread about apaches coming to ukraine pops up >someone mentions a few blew up in yemen >op uses this opportunity to do damage control, saying western aircraft are actually shit
>shot down by AnsarAllah, technical failure, etc
>technical failure, etc
kek
>majority are drones
topkek
>losses happened over 8 years
megatopkek
This is like serbians acting all high and mighty because they downed a single f-117 after NATO abused all of their holes and then even tore them a new butthole and abused that one too. Keep seething about American superiority.
Monkey export models with Arab crews
>82 aircraft (stretching the definition of aircraft) downed in 8 years
>meanwhile Russia has lost HUNDREDS in less than a year
Yikes.....
Cope
Also looking into that it seems 1/3rd of those losses are one type of drone (51 Orans) and and other 1/3rd are drones as well
Whereas Ukraine has lost most of it's air force (if 190 aircraft is to be believed on Wikipedia)
Counting Orlan 10 as a notable shoot down........
It's literally a toy
Yeah but it's used to inflate numbers
Russia's losses by fixed wing alone?
Probably around 50-70
But that's by mechanical error as well
Russia lost a shitloaf of its aircraft that it can use outside of the country. If they use any more, they may have to pull aircrafts from Syria(already happened since one of the guys that did bombings in Syria died in Ukraine) or do limited sorties from within their controlled territory or outside of Ukraine itself.
I mean
I wouldn't say it's too much considering they still have a shit ton leftover
And have just moved to using drones and missiles since it's cheaper and easier to use
Also why are we discussing Russian losses on an American losses thread
How many of those aircrafts are in operational conditions? How many of those aircrafts are actually there instead of being on paper? And how many pilots do they have available to take the spot? How many of those aircrafts are actually modernized?
Idk man I'm just some dude
How's your day been
Well, those are important when it comes to being able to utilize them in effective means. I am doing fine.
That's good
I'm just watching red letter media with my wife
>considering they still have a shit ton leftover
Proof? Can I see what condition they're in? Or am I supposed to believe vatnigs, who are proven liars?
Find me proof on the contrary
Not how it works, retart.
Cope
Seethe and dial8
Saudi Arabia lost 2 F-15's???? How'd they frick up that badly?
Says technical failure
One was shot down
Right so one was a technical failure.
Yeah so one shot down one lost by technical
Still embarrassing
F-15S SHOW 50% TECHNICAL FAILURE IN WAR XAXAXAXAXAX MUTTS ON SUICIDE WATCH
Its counting technical failures.
So what's causing the latest seething with the international allies of Russia? Is it Wagner getting cucked by the Russian military?
Oh no I'm just stirring the pot
Apparently Arabs shooting down american tech makes everyone ree
What makes people Ree about arabs being shit at war? Iraq is a good example that even if you have american tech, it won't stop them from being moronic.
>8 years of war
>11 planes killed
>16 helicopters killed
>rest is all drones
>only manned american losses are two helicopters
is this supposed to be impressive?
id say serbias 1 f117 kill is more impressive
F-15 losses
Do drones really count as aircraft? Is that a dumb question?
Ehhh if we count them for Russia we count them here
(51-70 of Russia's losses are drones)
>we count them for Russia
do we really? I'm sure oryx has a count of downed drones, but does he count them as "aircraft" or as "drones"?
Yeah check every site
They count all those drones
>thread about apaches coming to ukraine pops up
>someone mentions a few blew up in yemen
>op uses this opportunity to do damage control, saying western aircraft are actually shit