>5x magnification. >2.5"-3" long. >9 ounces with the mount. >Christmas tree reticle

>5x magnification
>2.5"-3" long
>9 ounces with the mount
>Christmas tree reticle
Alright, who even asked for this, and do other companies offer anything like this? Did someone write Primary Arms asking about a scope for their fantasy P90 DMR build?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I’m just waiting for the Japanese made model with nightforce glass

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      PA isn't going to get into the fray with Elcan and Trijicon, they know no one will be buying their pricier optics when people would rather spend that much on brand names that has recognition of military use.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Their PLX LPVOs made by light optical works aka the guys who make nightforce, vortex razors and other high end Japanese scopes tend to be selling well

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You're wrong simply because your average person has been shilled the acss reticle relentlessly and will think PA is just as good.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    2 reasons. A 0x red dot has limited application at distances you would want to use a rifle vs shotgun. CQB, shotgun wins all day everyday. Fight me.
    But as much as I love my brick of a compm4, it sucks outside of shooting paper inside 100yds.
    5x is a very good magnification for 100-300. And a prism is good for people with astigmatism.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >CQB, shotgun wins all day everyday.
      That depends on how you define CQB. There's a massive difference between civilian engagements with individuals/small groups of people exchanging shots at 25 yards or less where cover seldom comes into play and where putting people down with a quick decisive shot is the primary concern, and the military definition which covers firefights between large groups of people out to 100 meters where a large portion of your ammo will go to suppressing fire.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    YES

    Finally competition to Vortex's 5x prism and even lighter too. Great for a WWSD/lightweight build.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Could you be any gayer?

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >one ounce lighter than an ACOG
    >three times as dim
    nice

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      5 oz lighter with mount and half the size with more magnification and better reticle. going off other PA prisms, a better eye box, eye relief, and similar FOV.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Can't you just turn the brightness up?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >eye relief will suck
    >eyebox will suck
    >tiny FOV

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the 3x has better eye relief, better eye box, and more FOV than 4x acog

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        lower magnification scopes are normally going to have better all of that

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          piggybacked optics are gay, CQB is gay.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You're in GWOT
              >You can have JDAM support
              >You're not a SWAT member/Civvie
              >You don't live in a house
              >You don't own a car
              >etc etc
              What a useless infographic

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its not an infographic you dumb frick, and CQB is objectively one of the more dangerous forms of modern combat you can subject yourself to. also home defense is not CQB lol you aren't clearing rooms you're just sitting in your bedroom waiting for the cops to show up unless you WANT to be shot in the back of the head

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >its not an infographic
                What would you call it, then?
                >NOT CQB!!!!
                Ignore the SWAT part too, nice. Why don't you respond to the response in /arg/ calling you out as well?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >What would you call it, then?

                a meme. its an edit of an absurdist meme picture.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Grenades is all you need

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I was thinking of rigging my front door with directional charges, but then I remembered I don't live alone 🙁

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          except it has significantly more. 38 feet

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            1.2ft more

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              my mistake i thought the 4x was 31 feet

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Do you not realize that’s an effect of the lower magnification? If you turn down the magnification on an LPVO from 4x to 3x, your FOV also increases.

            You should be looking at the relative FoV. Multiply FoV by magnification. 4x ACOG = 36.8*4. Primary Arms 3x Microprism = 38*3.

            ACOG comes ahead by 30%. If the TA31 was a 3x instead of a 4x, it would have a considerably wider FoV than the PA 3x.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              lol good luck turning down the magnification on your 4x ACOG dipshit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Put a magnifier on backwards, ez

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Missing the point. Have a good day dumbass.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                your so-called "point" was risible and invalid. have a shitty day moron.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tree reticle
    They said ACSS mil grid, so is it going to be the ACSS Griffin, or something else?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i cant imagine being able to effectively use all that math homework down there in a scope that tiny

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what the frick is up with these meme overly complicated reticles, it's absolutely autistic to have a christmas tree on a fixed 5x prism

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >No top RMR (or similar) mount
    Dropped. I'll buy a Vortex.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no you wont lol the spitfire 5x is trash.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Proofs?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          1 MOA per click

          >No top RMR (or similar) mount
          Dropped. I'll buy a Vortex.

          Also the vortex piggyback footprint is for their gay venom dot which sucks

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >1 MOA per click
            >fine enough adjustments to put your bullets within 1/2 MOA of where they need to be
            Is this actually a problem?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              in a world where 1 moa ARs aren't very hard to accomplish, a 1-moa adjustment is trash. every self-respecting company has 1/2-moa adjustments on their magnified optics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >b-but ARs can shoot 1 MOA
                Can you? Besides that, you aren't achieving that precise of holds with a BDC reticle.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                why would you willingly have a gun that is less accurate when you can make one more accurate?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because accuracy isn't max deviation from factor X + max deviation from factor Y + etc., and having your zero within 1/2 MOA of where your bullet is hitting rather than within 1/4 MOA is effectively meaningless.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >effectively meaningless.

                weird how all of a sudden its acceptable to have 1-moa clicks ever since this 5x prism got announced and all the vortex users crawled out of their holes to shill the spitfire.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, only optics I own are made by Primary Arms. An additional 1/4 MOA difference in your zero vs the point of impact of your bullets is absolutely meaningless given how that kind of optic is meant to be used.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok well so far the only thing the spitfire has going for it is the rmr plate on the 5x and thats it. the stock mount is trash btw and the hex screws will strip instantly.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >shit that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand
                Okay.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                my point is that regardless of your opinions on MOA clicks, the PA prism has finer ones and generally speaking it is better on paper than the spitfire at ever level of magnification. the ONLY reason to go with a spitfire is to get the rmr mount.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >continues to rattle of points about why he thinks product A is better than product B
                We get it anon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I used to shoot with a DD rear iron that used 1 moa clicks for windage. It sucked for zeroing at 300 yds.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It sucked for zeroing at 300 yds.
                Who even does this with iron sights outside of a match environment?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            1 moa clicks, 14 hr auto-of and no auto-on.

            I will agree with the annoyance of 1MOA clicks, though it doesn't outweigh the compactness and ability to have an RMR on top for poorgay ACOG LARPING, etc.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          1 moa clicks, 14 hr auto-of and no auto-on.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    speaking of magnified prisms on a P90, help me better understand eye relief: would you only have a full picture if your eyes were the ~3 inches or less from the optic? farther away, say, on a PS90 with extended buttstock, at like twice that, like 7" would the picture be shrunk with a fat black ring to the edge of the peep?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there is a range of eye relief where you get the full image, but how wide this range is varies wildly by scope.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being the Leviathan reviewer for this

    >Why do you give me your shittiest products
    >Because you are my best shill

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they're the Kel-Tec of optics

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ok so hear me out

    Flip to side PA 5x microprism with BUIS

    No red dot even required anymore

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How much fov it going to have?

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like the 3x, I can hit 225 yards 10” plate with subsonic 300 blackout using the bottom cross hatch

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When the frick are they gonna stick this and a 1x into a rotating body and make a cheap Elcan 1-4x competitor?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      part of the trouble with the elcan is making something hold zero while flipping. russian copies have terrible poi shift

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that's not actually a problem with the elcan, though it has been repeated enough that low-information people nonetheless believe it. you zero it with the 4x lens, and since you only use the 1x for close range shit it doesn't really matter if it's an inch off. and even then it turned out that the only reason there was a POI shift at all on the very first models was a lack of detents at the ends of the lever, so the lever could get bumped out of position leaving the internal lenses slightly misaligned. elcan added detents after the first year's production and even that minor niggle went away.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i said russian copies of the elcan did that ya dangus

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I know this comes as a total surprise to you, anon, but you forgot to delete your original comment before posting your lie

            part of the trouble with the elcan is making something hold zero while flipping. russian copies have terrible poi shift

            >part of the trouble with the elcan
            now go away while we laugh at your stupidity

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              i didn't say the elcan had POI shift. i said the trouble with making it is that it can occur.
              elcans don't have it. but that's part of why they're expensive. it's hard to make it.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Alright, who even asked for this
    all the homosexuals on instagram saying lpvos suck

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    anything other than Eotech + magnifie is just closeted in denial homosexualry because all youre doing with these homosexual low power optics is trying to emulate 'muh ebin speshul fowsays" and homosexual SOFs run nods and nod compatible setups

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anon...most non-special forces use acogs. Those are low power optics.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Would have been nice with a way to mount a dot on top

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >P90 DMR build
    Funny you mention that. I originally got one of those but lower magnification for my P90. I sighted it in and when I looked through it with both eyes open I had complete double vision and it was disorienting to look through. Like the PA microprism could only handle a limited amount of height over bore before it completely shit itself and was worthless as an optic. I returned it and put my old 4x Acog on it and the height over bore does not negatively affect the Acog whatsoever. Could see perfectly clear with both eyes open.

    Just letting you know that the PA microprisms are essentially worthless if you're doing a large amount of height over bore.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Let me explain it to you. People own 1x, 3x, and variable power optics. Now here is a chance to buy a 5x optic! This hobby has become about consuming unfortunately. You have to buy all the newest and best gear that maximizes your paper target killing potential. Really pathetic actually.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      5x prisms aren't new

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *