>20 inch barrel for optimal ballistics
>quadrail, as god intended
>A2 stock to filter manlets
>ACOG with amazing FoV and reticle for mid range combat
It really was the best service rifle.
>20 inch barrel for optimal ballistics. >quadrail, as god intended. >A2 stock to filter manlets
Jamz
Ok boomer
Yh
Adjustable stocks are straight upgrades. Also the A2 grip sucks. Also it should use a piston instead of shooting shit into the chamber
Adjustable stock is an important upgrade. Quad rails are not that important.
Yeah
Fun
Pretty based
>Quad rails are not that important.
even if you don't want to attach shit to your rifle they're still a pretty huge improvement over traditional M16 heat shields
>they're still a pretty huge improvement over traditional M16 heat shields
how?
they weigh more
they are worse at shielding you from heat and uncomfortable compared to the clamshell
unless you cover them in crap which makes them weigh even more.
you can argue freefloating makes the gun more accurate but not every quadrail is freefloat.
if you arent attaching anything its a costly downgrade really
Adjustable stocks are a downgrade
t. manlets with stocky arms
>Also the A2 grip sucks
fat
>Adjustable stocks are straight upgrades
>Never adjusts it, leaves it in the middle position at all times
why do you need an adjustable stock on a 20” upper? moronic
Do you never take your guns out of the house? Have you ever stowed them in a vehicle? No need to reply, I already know the answer.
sure I do, it can go under the back seat just fine therefore it works for me
Wow, you sure showed me boomers!
Maybe try mounting and dismounting instead of being moronic range fudds. Ya know, the primary reason adjustable stocks are used in the military?
the only thing you’re mounting or dismounting is your mobility scooter you fat frick.
Better than what your dog is doing. I feel bad for him the way your wife has him mounting and dismounting.
>muh military
don't care, not my problem
are you too poor to afford a case?
the only reason to adjust the stock is for storage or if you're a 5 ft nothing mexican
I'm 6'5" and the adjustable stock on a C7A2 makes shooting with plates way nicer
>A2 grip sucks
Is this a problem for big or small hands?
Neither, it's a problem for short arms. Lengthlets can't into the angle
The angle objectively sucks. No one chickenwings anymore, grandpa
I don't run A2's anyway, I'm just pointing out that people that aren't adult sized struggle with the A2 angle.
A2 sucks for everyone. A2 angle is dogshit for a modern stance
maybe because you have a 62” reach, little guy
>ur a manlet haha
Black person
im white and 6’1. stay angry inferior human
Awww, he's just a teeny tiny wittle man
For all the adjustable stock deniers, if you wear a plate carrier you will have a different length of pull depending on the rig. Adjustable is essential for modern combat, fixed is essential for larpers who shoot from a rest and suck off the RO.
If you had self awareness you'd know its the other way around.
Uh-huh, the old "actually opposite" argument, real grade a shit right there
agreed. best service rifle ever honestly.
>burst
They shouldn't have shortened the rifle, they should've just made the vehicles bigger. Change my mind.
This is correct and all else is wrong. Imagine being a foreigner and walking into American armor without having to duck your head. Absolutely ruin other vehicles for them and cause their brass to hear incessant b***hing until they redesign their vehicles. But then they quit halfway and just buy American stuff that's already available.
That's the most cart before the horse shit I've ever heard but I like it
>stock to filter manlets
>best service rifle
You, truly, do not know shit about general infantry.
-0351 who was in the fleet during the transition to the m4
Carbines are superior to rifles in the modern supported infantry role. Just like in helldivers, if it's not within 300 yards or so, calling in CAS or Arty is what you're going to do. Proper rifles for GI still make more sense in unsupported infantry tho.
I see you have quite the imagination
Stay in your lane LT, there's a reason or two why you don't get the reps we do at MOUT town.
ofc you didn't consider that, you knew getting a different setup was completely out of the question back then. Jesus frick do none of you have any sense or self awareness? Shoot what you want in this hobby but war does in fact change and the best bundle of compromises that becomes a service rifle changes with it.
Is this why they are running back to longer barrels and larger calibers?
get the frick out Nerd.
why does it have a front sight if it doesn't have a rear sight?
The carry handle is removable.
why not remove the front sight too, then?
Because it's not removable
Because its also the gas block
just cut off the top bit, it's just in the way.
>t. CoD developer
Better than in the original CoD 4, where the whole thing was removed, gas block included.
Shalom!
>A2 stock to filter manlets
Why do morons say this? 20 inch AR served with distinction for 30 years in the Army and 50 years in the USMC with no short person ever complaining about them being too long. M1 Garands also served for 20 years, 1936 to 1957, with no one complaining about being too long. The military is full of short of people, and I've never read or heard an account of an infantrymen b***hing that his arms were too short for his rifle.
I'm 5'5 and own a 20' inch AR and multiple surplus rifles, and none of them are too short. Manlet shit talking never gets to me, but this is one that always pisses me off because it has no basis on anything. Like for real, frick you.
The rifle length stock is superior for pleasant shooting but sucks DICK in a highly mechanized operation with constant mounting and dismounting
>t. Owns a C7A2 and solid stock C7 clone, thoroughly enjoys both
Because they're 5'10 and want to feel some kind of superiority. If they really wanted a gun to filter armlets they'd suck off the VHS-2
>no one complaining about being too long
Yes, they do, when going through tight spaces in a hurry. Which is a position where manlets take up less of the space in the doorway, so if anything, they can handle longer guns.
>never gets to me
Bro... not helping.
The A2 stock sucks. Try shooting from other positions besides the bench. I have an a5 receiver extension specifically due to being able to adjust the stock for different positions/ optics choices. The only upside to a full-size rifle is more real estate in the front. This can be mitigated by an extended rail. Other than that, 14.5 or shorter.
t. 6'4" Yeti
>Try shooting from other positions besides the bench.
I do homosexual. The rifle is fine.
No you dont. If you actually used your firearms for their intended purpose instead of a personality you would learn what everyone else already has. You hang a light and a can off the end of a 20-inch FF gun and you're going to run into a bad time. Getting optimum sight alignment in different positions is simply not possible with a fixed stock. Thats just for starters. You got manlet rage buddy. Its a state of mind. Fix it.
>If you actually used your firearms for their intended purpose instead of a personality you would learn what everyone else already has.
I'm an infantry officer in the Army so I guarantee I've used firearms for their intended purpose more than your larping ass. There's nothing I've done with a 14.5 inch rifle that couldn't have been done with a 20 inch.
Thats nice fella been shooting ars and other assorted rifles for decades. Thats beside the point. Neither of our experiences can negate reality, which you are currently attempting to do.
>There's nothing I've done with a 14.5 inch rifle that couldn't have been done with a 20 inch.
what would that be, shooting at multiple moving targets for an extended length of time?
>shorter
kicking down doors?
>shorter
rucking long distances?
>shorter
mounted
>shorter
>adding anything at all to the muzzle end?
whoa boy...
>larper
thats funny, I never stated I did anything but shoot targets, projecting maybe? One would think someone who is an "infantry officer" would know more about the equipment they're assigned. You sound just like a fat no shoots basement dweller desperately trying to justify his 20 lb parts bin FAL.
None of that shit is difficult or impossible with a 20 inch rifle. Hence back to my original point that the M16 and its variants served just fined for 50 years.
What point are you even trying to make?
Not him but I was infantry in the Muhreenes and when I was in 08 to 12, we used the M16A4, had the A2 stock and a 20 inch barrel. I had plates and gear and a horrible optic for eye relief and I didn't even consider all that until I got out of the service and then LARPERs on YouTube who play Arma started complaining about all this petty shit regarding guns.
>rucking long distances?
if 4.5 inches of extra barrel affects your rucking time, then lol
down doors?
>= Shoot Pets
long distances?
>Ounces = Pounds, Pounds = More Pain
x2Reply/Excuse = GlowBlack person Manlet Confirmed.
And it looks so fricking sexy too
I miss mine.Never should'be pawned it.
>loses every conflict it’s been in
AK chads stay winning
>Grenada
>Panama
>Desert Storm
>Iraqi Freedom
These were losses?
>grenada
>panama
>desert storm
Not A4
>ISIS (AK)-Taliban (M16A4) Conflict
>Taliban victory
I'm sorry. I should have realized you were trolling.
>Soviet Union
>Afghanistan
big L ak bro.
Am I crazy? This 20" barrel doesn't even look that long to be a hassle.
It's certainly one of the most aesthetic service rifles of all time.
Close but the M4 is peak
Close but the 6944/SCAR/ACC-M/RO923 is peak
Gene and plenty of others didn't like the M1 rifle's sights. With a point blank range that's further than the vast majority of engagements, there's not much point to having additional adjustability unless you're being led by a moron who thinks 18th century squad tactics are relevant today. Private nutz or whatever his name was that was responsible for the A2 sights literally cited his fantasies about being an old timey officer instructing ranks of soldiers through the firing process like they're using muskets as the reason for the A2 sights
What handguard is that? I remember the ACC handguard being shorter and more triangular.
no gun with a government profile barrel can ever be "peak". the gov't profile barrel is moronic
>thinnest near the chamber where thermal mass is most important
>thickest at the very end where it makes the rifle as front-heavy as possible for no reason
C7A2 was better and I'm not even a leaf.
>>20 inch barrel for optimal ballistics
20" is a compromise for ease of carry, just like 16", 14.5", 11.5", and 5.5".
Peak 5.56 velocity comes from 24 inch to 26 inch barrels, depending on the load.
>Sexy green furniture
>Tri-rail with a simple WML and plain handguard is comfy and efficient
>Adjustable stock
>Forward-mounted rear sight is comfy but always gets lost
>Elcan is great, but the mount kinda sucks and the screws often get stripped
Honestly, if they’d fix the goddamn optic mount and make a 2nd gen rear sight with a better screw type and made out of aluminum, it’d be peak.
Leave it t theo canadians to build a better AR than burgeroids
You forgot the heavier barrel that's full auto capable too.
Why has the A2 grip become such a pleb filter?
Who's got those quad rails in stock right now?
>A2 stock to filter manlets
you fricking butthole
The goofy gov.t barrel profile is the worst part
Retvrn.
Only based and correct post in this thread.
>perfect stock length
>no knobbly weird grip finger nubs
>lightweight barrel for peak balance
>comfy handguard
Only possible improvements:
>free float handguard of same shape (why doesn't this exist)
>elevation adjustment knob on rear sight
>move rear sling mount to rear of receiver
Berfegt for every occasion.
>b-but heckin' jamz!!
Don't use dogshit powder and then you won't be able to make it stop
>captcha was M4Y8
So something like pic related, but with a different barrel length.
I’m not a fan of the fatass VCOG, but the PRI handguard/Magpul stock combo is nice. But I’m biased, I like Magpul furniture, even if it isn’t the sexy zoomer moron meta.
Never seen that before. I didn't know that existed. So yes, that (but in black for Vietnam larping)
I guess one further improvement (and only because it doesn't affect the aesthetic) for prostate stimmies would be a silent capture.
A1 supremacist bros unite
Blessed
>A2 stock to filter manlets
why do people believe this?
i see more manlets with fixed stocks than anything else, i'm even proof of it
Ukrainians got some M16's and said they were a bit big for clearing trenches.
nah
>A1
>A2 handguards
The best it could ever be
i like the A1 handguards but theyre flimsy as frick and get mangled very easily. also the A2 handguard is much more comfortable.
The A2 has better sights than the A1 and I am tired of pretending otherwise. Every time some homosexual complains about the A2's sights in the same breath they go on how the m1 Garand's sights were amazing. The A2 was a better rifle other than the longer stock and the moronic burst fire. The grip isn't bad, the brass deflector was a god send for left handed gays, the furniture was better etc. I don't understand how anyone hates on the A2 sights and says "It way to complicated and its not good battle sights" yet in ww2 you had illiterate morons having no issue using the sighting system on the m1 which was just as complicated.
The A2 irons are better but the A1/C7 receiver is more aesthetic
A2 stock sucks when wearing body armor. otherwise everything else on an M16A4 is perfectly fine, but i'd swap out the trigger for a good combat two stage or full-auto instead of that burst nonsense
why do the 20" gays always have something to prove? wow little billy, it is so cool that you can hold up a 10lb rifle! that is so much weight! you are going to grow up to be big and strong one day! *pats you on the head*
These aren't heavy.
Frick rails. Poly clams are
Love my C7A2 build
The 20 inch air force M16A1 was 6 lbs you spaz.
because it makes barrellets seethe
every single 20" AR stan owns a PSA m16 clone and the only shooting they do is sit-down slow fire at the state range.
Adjustable stock is a straight upgrade. The A2 stock design has tons of wasted space and is hard to get a cheek weld on if i gets wet or you're sweating at all.
Those old KAC quad rails were unnecessarily heavy, anti-ergonomic as frick to grip and messed with the balance of the rifle.
ACOG/RCO was the biggest upgrade of the A4, everything else was either one step forward and one step back or just continued the same issues as the A2 had.
this homie ain't got no skittle storage in his stock
point and laugh
Half the time the trapdoor latches on those stocks were totally seized up.
Even when they work they're a pain in the ass to open and close.
For the quadrail nerds the only thing you're putting on those rails is a light, a laser(lol), and a memegrip. Your optic is mounted above the BCG on the upper. You don't need four rails, that's silly.
>Bill of needs
Buy what you want. I'm in favor of full repeal if the NFA and full rights for felons.
Did we miss out
Having it be semi auto and burst only was always beyond moronic. With the M4 it was even more moronic, it was a carbine for fricks sake.