19 ATTEMPTS
All failed. Last one not only failed, but aslo clipped drone propeller.
https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1636235794120855554
19 ATTEMPTS. All failed. Last one not only failed, but aslo clipped drone propeller.
19 ATTEMPTS
All failed. Last one not only failed, but aslo clipped drone propeller.
https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1636235794120855554
It clipped more than the prop, you moron. The stabilizers extend significantly past the prop.
no anon, you see....
>anti-rape device
It didnt protected fully but it prevented the rape!
a pissed off rapist with a bleeding dick a lot more dangerous
A profesional rapist would first check if the vegana is safe. If not, he would check the other holes.
How to turn a rape into a murder with this one easy trick.
glavset aeromorph porn when?
considering the drone lost connection to the comm satellite from the impact, it was probably a full on body slam.
Correct, which implies non trivial damage to the Russian plane.
It clearly did not clip anything. Have you ever watched any car accidents on camera? Things move when they're hit.
I am thoroughly convinced that zigger shills are refusing to actually watch the fricking video of the russian jet clearly colliding with the drone because that would be counter to what the Kremlin told them to believe.
If the pilots wanted to "accidentally " crash the drone without crashing themselves they did a good job considering the closure rate for the drone and aircraft are probably in excess of 400 knots at each pass.
- oops , I said something that is true and at the same not disparaging towards Russia. I must be a Pootin stoooge.
No they didn't, based on how it was flying, it was clearly unintentional. Now cope, moron.
The important was to take down the drone, which they did.
Yes, Hostomel and Chechnya were great Russian victories. Viva monke.
ESL
>The important was to
Jesus Christ I wish you foreign morons would frick off and stop shitting up my board
If that had been the goal, the pilot would have approached differently. Coming in the way he did he lost sight of the drone and tried to get away by pulling up abruptly, then he slammed into it.
The fact that we haven't seen the plane afterwards implies the damage to the fighter was pretty bad.
if the goal was to destroy the drone they should have just shot it. fricking with it to make it crash is the same as attacking it.
They knew pussy Biden wouldn’t do shit about it if they bumped into it. But even Biden might have done something if they actually shot it down.
Frick off ESL.
Why not just shoot it down? its a fricking unarmed surveilance drone against a fighter jet. Did they really need 19 passes to accomplish that?
19 unintentional passes
Lmao
>18 passes trying to spray fuel on drone and failing
>last pass trying to spray the fuel on drone and actually ramming it instead
Yeah, its pretty evident it was unintentional , and you have to be fricking moronic not to see it.
>tossing rocks at people
>don't always hit
>but when it does, it wasn't intentional!
>keep doing it anyways
This is some moron logic
OK, if the goal was to bring the drone down by ramming it why were they also dumping fuel on it and why did they miss it so many times. The goal was clearly to harass the drone and convince it to either leave or crash itself via operator error reacting to the Russian maneuvers. Instead the Russians freaking rammed it which is a very silly thing to do if you are in a jet with missiles and want to shoot down an unarmed propeller plane with a heat signature.
>fuel dump
Trying stupid shit to see what works. When it didn't work they resorted to other options.
>using weapons
>open act of hostility
>against another nation's assets when you're not openly in a conflict with
That's a quick way to open up another front against another nation when Russia can't even finish their 2 week special military operation despite the fact its been over a year. So that leaves stupid shit like ramming.
It's like you hating your neighbor's dog because he keeps shitting on your lawn but you can't just shoot the dog and get away with it.
>It's like you hating your neighbor's dog because he keeps shitting on your lawn but you can't just shoot the dog and get away with it.
Yea, but to continue the metaphor, the Russians drove the wrong way down the 4 lane highway that separates them from the dog, in front of the neighbor's doorbell camera, with their car to try and kill it "accidentally" by running it over, which is almost as bad since it's only plausibly deniable if you're a complete fricking moron who has should have their license pulled and significantly more moronic.
>If the pilots wanted to "accidentally " crash the drone without crashing themselves they did a good job
They would simply shot it down with exactly same result, but without damaging own plane.
There is a big difference politically between harassing a drone resulting in an "accidental" crash, and shooting down a rivals aircraft in international airspace. The Russians can't risk turning it into open season on thier aircraft's.
No yeah you're right. I am actually surprised they have any pilots capable of that. IF it was intentional and they weren't just fricking around like teenagers.
Ear shit putin puppet
>ear shit
>nearly colliding head-on with a 20 year old UAV is an example of being a good pilot
Decent bait.
Air to air collisions are a normal part of owning a jet
>Be fine
>Watch trannies clutch pearls
>He still lets trannies live rent-free in his head.
>did a good job
>crashed
That's not a good job anon lol. If you do something really dangerous 19 times, get away with it 18 times and then frick your own plane up on the last try you don't get to brag
>crashed
I haven’t seen anything that indicated that the jet crashed.
If you saw this on your rear view mirror, with the two frames being a second apart, what do you think would have happened to your rear end?
Idc he'd be at fault for rear ending. Might take my foot off the gas to piss him off
da comrade is merely act of goodwill
attack above from 6 with gsh in drone camera blind spot, claim you never touched it and it just lost control after you passed it. why risky clown shit with pissing fuel and ramming from the angle where drone camera can record it?
for the PR win, russians unironically take the troll mindset to the geostrategic level
I think surviving a midair collision is just too much of a pray for a nat 20 dice roll for that to be the case.
>Pootin stoooge
You've been posting this shit for days and I don't get why.
YOU'RE LUCKY I CAN'T FIND THE DOWENVOTE BUTTON YOU VAGNIHH SCUM
>If the pilots wanted to "accidentally " crash the drone
you are a moron
How long did it take you to make that, private?
He stole it from some shitty American news source who made it before the video came out based on a press release.
did they do the golden shower thing every attempt? just how much fuel can you fit into those things, from the video the dod released it looks like they are ejecting a frickload
Why the frick can you dump fuel mid flight anyway? You just press the "open" button and it can pour out? It's on the bottom then? Gravity or forceful ejection?
>Why the frick can you dump fuel mid flight anyway?
you don't want to land with full fuel tanks, so if you have to do an emergency landing shortly after takeoff, you dump fuel. airliners do this too
fuel tanks are pressurised famalam.
Why won't she stop talking, is she a translator or does she think she's at a movie?
Guess tv or radio moderator?
did we learn where the sukhois were operating from?
Devil's advocate: It's difficult to ram something that small, especially when all your natural instincts tell you 'don't hit the thing'. So 19 passes isn't something to be ridiculed.
What is to be ridiculed is the fact that Russia is trying to argue that intentionally destroying US property is somehow an accident just because they didn't use bullets or missiles.
>It's difficult to ram something that small
Bruh. MQ-9 wingspan is 20-27 meters, Su-27 wingspan is 14 meters.
It is TWICE bigger than russian jet.
>very high aspect ratio wings means it's HUGE
Come on. The drone has wings that are sp thin and long that it's almost glider tier. The Su-27 meanwhile is a notably bloated b***h closer in size to an F-111 Aardvark than something like an F-16.
Suckprostitutes are all massive planes because the Russians have lost the ability to actually engineer things. Can't find a pic that really compares the Su-27 and MQ-9 at scale, so here's a Sukhoi next to an F-16 to illustrate how fricking moronicly big it is.
Misread the comment chain, and I now see the point you're making. I retract my taunts.
Here's another photo of the sukhoi being fat next to the inestimably more attractive, vastly better proportioned, and just all around prettier and effective MiG-29.
The MQ-9 is not a small aircraft.
>inestimably more attractive, vastly better proportioned, and just all around prettier and effective MiG-29
based Mikoyan enjoyer.
So it has hitbox of Raptor.
AC-5 when
>Suckprostitutes are all massive planes because the Russians have lost the ability to actually engineer things.
That's not why the Flanker is so fricktardedly huge, but thanks for playing.
Keep in mind that the Su-27 was designed to be a heavy, high performance (your milage may vary) counter-air fighter in the same way that the F-15 was. If you look at the lighter MiG 29 for example, it's much closer in size to the F-16. Also since Soviet/Russian aerial refueling was and still is subpar to put it politely, the Flanker series carries massive internal fuel tanks to extend the range out to something like 3'500 Km [1]. How the Su-35 performs with 11.5 tons of fuel weighing it down is another subject entirely though.
[1]: https://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-27/su-27_specifications.htm
>wingspan
I guess that would matter if the jet was trying to impact with the reaper’s wings, but it wasn’t, so the wingspan is entirely irrelevant.
Maybe the US should start "accidentally" firing AIM-9s from UAVs due to Russian electronic interference.
Russia will soon discover whole technological secret of american drone fabrication.
Next socks and pallets. I'm shaking.
Failed to do what?
Is there any news of the plane that collided with the drone?
I liked how Denys was like "No this is dumb Macho idiot way to do it, best way is you come up behind and hit it with your wing the way these guys do it they could wreck themselves ..."
His voice got clearer and more focused and I'm like Denys you flew the Antonov were you downing drones in that thing?
Why didn't USA shot russian plane down after 2nd attempt? Intention was clear, agressive action.
Objective achieved. Limit the data the drone can get by forcing it to go elsewhere. Russia has played the US for absolute fools.
>posts image that shows nothing
>Mission Accomplished
Shoigu?
This image shows the Global Hawk flying literally directly over where the MQ-9 went down, loitering near Sochi for a while, then heading over to the Moldova-Romania border.
If you overlay its route with its normal patrol over the sea. It has only done a fraction of its usual time. It also kept well south apart from a couple of small loops. Does look like a very cautious approach.
>compared 24h of flights with months
>vi von
Months? Try again
Possibly, could just as well be that they wanted to take a look at something else. We can only speculate based on this tiny amount of publicly available info. The MQ-9 didn't have a transponder on right? So it's entirely possible there are more surveillance aircraft in the area we can't see.
pay no attention to the artemis jet that has been flying along the ukranian border for the last year
Hitting the propeller was obviously unintentional as the jet was also dumping fuel on that pass
Reminder
>Last one not only failed, but aslo clipped drone propeller.
>If you destroy your enemy's equipment they win
>your last pass actually disabled our drone..that's a yikes from me sweaty..
cope more
>we only pretended to be unskilled
They could have rammed it on first attempt if that was their plan and spare the humiliation.
>humiliation
russians have had their share to deal with lately but this isn't one of them
they fricking T-bagged your drone
No matter how you want to spin it, piggy, 19 tries to damage it with afterburn and eventually simply colliding with it is pure incomptetence.
ok
your drone is still dead though
The Rusdians are caught, once again, RED hatded acting as international criminals attacking sovereign state assests without provocation or Clear Rules of Engagement. And displaying HUMILIATING INCOMPETENCE doing it. Cope harder.
>Russian pilots crashing into a drone instead of another russian apartment complex is a glorious win for ruzzia now.
The absolute fricking state of ziggers.
>The drone flew 1-2 meter above the ground level
>83 replies to this garbage
Wow nu/k/ strikes again
t. filthy noguns tourist