100 Strykers. 50 more Bradleys

Stryker and Bradley on the ocean. Putin his face black his eyes red

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-military-technology-45417ab5b91036fc291cedf357533509

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why Strykers and not Strikers? Dyslexia?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was named after two soldiers who won the Medal of Honour. Surnames were both Stryker.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I though they were brothers or something but apparently they're both unrelated. That's weird.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like a good way to turn old inventory into new money for arms manufacturers at the taxpayers expense

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're going to be paying for them anyway, what's the issue? Either they sit in storage and are replaced at the 'taxpayers expense' or they're sent to Ukraine and are replaced at the 'taxpayers expense'. What is the issue here? Russia taking Ukraine WOULD massively increase your tax rate because USA would now have to deal with a Russia with a massive control over gas and wheat who would be eyeing up the Baltic's next, something USA has an obligation to defend.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're probably trolling but I know there's tons of morons that really buy into this. I'm so sick of this braindead retard take. It's not free money, it's already been bought and paid for, it's WORTH a certain amount of money, but that money was spent decades ago when the damn things were first built, in fact it's more expensive to maintain the fucking thing then to give it away to kill Russians which is exactly what it was built for in the first place.
      A car you bought for 10,000 dollars 20 years ago that you don't use anymore is just gathering dust in the garage, you decide to give it away to a relative, did you just give your relative 10,000 dollars?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Don't bother trying to reason with the tards who parrot that shitty ass take. The funny thing is everyone I know who has this same take of 'OUR TAX MONEY WAAAH" is fucking unemployed lol.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Also actual combat data from fighting the enemy the designers planned it to fight.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      USA military budget is an annual thing. Giving away leftover for 2-3 times return on investment by killing vatfricans is great bang for the buck. Russia will take 5-10 years recovering in comparison, that is if the country doesn't collapse and fragment

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        20 years to recover and may never recover with ongoing sanctions, like they suddenly find crude to be edible

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What't the strategic advantage of pissing of the most the most powerful country in human history into giving your enemy weapons that are better then yours?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ivan is still mad about the pallets.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    2 more weeks

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So THAT'S why the shills are out in force tonight.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is the role of a Stryker supposed to be versus a Bradley? Why does the US have two IFVs?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Motorised vs mechanised.
      A motorised brigade can drive itself to wherever you need it to go. Mechanised forces (i.e tracked) need transporter wagons or trains to get to the front. Obviously tracked IFVs and tanks are going to beat up a wheeled force in the battlefield (most of the time), but there's value in just being able to hop in your vehicle and get to the front from anywhere, especially if the enemy need to redploy mechanised units from elsewhete to stop you.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thanks anon. How far can you travel on tracks before you run into problems? Why can't you go cross-country in a tracked vehicle?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          not him, but tracked vehicles guzzle gas and are way more maintenance intensive. It's not so much that they can't go large distances, more that it isn't usually practical to do so. To drive the point home, a Stryker can get 6 mpg on roads while a Bradley gets something like .75 mpg

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What

          not him, but tracked vehicles guzzle gas and are way more maintenance intensive. It's not so much that they can't go large distances, more that it isn't usually practical to do so. To drive the point home, a Stryker can get 6 mpg on roads while a Bradley gets something like .75 mpg

          said, but also tracks fuck up roads no end. Even with rubber track pads they put a lot more wear on the tarmac and the pads themselves cause the tracks to require more maintenance

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stryker is an APC more like M113 rather than an IFV
      Apart from the "Dragoon" version they added a 30mm cannon to

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stryker isn't an IFV, you could argue the dragoon variant is but it doesn't fulfill the same role.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      dennis

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bruh who the fuck off PrepHole is paying enough taxes to say they pay for any of the shit we are sending off to UKraine???

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is the Stryker MGS good? I heard the autoloader was unreliable

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, there's a reason why we're phasing it out so fast.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly I'd like to see us dump pretty much our whole storage of Bradley's on them or as many modernized we have and draw down active military units to compensate. Every Bradley in Ukraine isn't one used on me in the US.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *